when few rule the many it is bad but the UN wants to make it seem like world peace. world unity and peace is good but not when dictated by a few powerful groups who control the finances. more community involvement is needed right now.
In order for a country to become communist, someone has to endorse communism. That person is likely in high power. In order for that leader to endorse communism they would have to know a lot about it, and therefore they would have to know that it predisposes his/her self and future leaders to become greedy, given that they can do whatever they want. If the person still wants to endorse communism anyway, that shows that they don't care or are not thinking about the future. This ultimately leads to high power greed and poverty for the people. If a leader truly knows what's best for their country they'll choose a structure of government in which power is vested in the people, and execution is vested in the authorities; providing that the people keep executives in check, and the executives keep the people in check – reducing the chance of corruption on both sides.
10 months ago
Last edited at 12:56PM on 2/3/2013
"Ism's" are such slippery little suckers. They start to morph and mutate almost from the moment of inception - and can become little more than convenient labels for the intellectually lazy and/or dishonest. As for communism, it should be acknowledged that as a mechanism for transforming largely illiterate peasant farmer populations into literate industrial workers, it has proven remarkably swift & effective - though brutal. People forget how brutal the hundreds of years of the Industrial Revolution were under capitalism. Please do not take this as an endorsement of either,merely an objective observation.In their "pure" forms, ideologies - political, economic or religious - invariably prove to be untenable in the long term.