no.. to a certain degree. history had almost been promoting god since the dawn of man. science had limited gods existence. science is like, god created the origin, but science explains everything else. hope this helped. star and follow me please!
Nope -- there is no scientific proof regarding the existence of god, OR non-existence. That's something that will never have definite, concrete proof one way or the other, so believe what YOU believe in -- and, whatever that may be, it is the right belief for YOU. :)
If you use the scientific method when asking a question about a god's existence, then you could disprove it using reasoning and common sense.
Of course, faith and believing in an invisible higher power cannot be determined by science, because science is based on things you can perceive with your senses. Ex: We know gravity exists because humans do not fly off of the earth randomly, but are pulled down to it.
well bassicly your teacher would be can you see go? can you feel god ? and youll answer no and your teacher will say well he dont exist then youll be like can you see your brain? can you feel your brain? then shell answer no so her brain dont exist
Nope. As a matter of fact, when I study science and history, (especially science), my belief in God gets stronger. It reminds me how many amazing things God has created. Just studying about the human body itself is mind boggling. Another thing that's even more amazing is how some of those scientific discoveries are already written in the Qur'an, which is from more than 1400 years ago. But of course it's not that surprising because the Qur'an is in Gods words, and God knows all those scientific discoveries made, and all those that will be made in the future. God CREATED science and history. The universe is proof of Gods existence.
No. You cannot disprove something that has not yet been proved.
We must open our eyes to that of which is intangible; for those who believe in the same sort of intangible things, are also capable of believing in God. God's presence is found in the soul and faith alone.
Suppose I set out to prove pink flamingoes exist. I may find one my first week, or it may take a while; but as soon as I find just one, I have proven the hypothesis.
Suppose I set out to prove purple flamingoes do not exist. I may search for years w/o finding any purple flamingoes, but that is not conclusive proof they do not exist. I may not have looked in every corner of the earth, then every corner of the solar system, then every corner of the galaxy. To prove non-existence requires all knowledge everywhere.
So, no, not at all; your hypothesis is a practical and logical impossibility.
No, the study of history and science has actually done a lot to prove the existence of God. For example at Isaiah 40:22 the Bible talks about how the Earth is round and the heavens are being stretched out. We know from Science that the Earth is round and that the universe continues to expand each and every day. Science proved something that was written in the Bible almost 4000 years ago. For history we can look at the accuracy of Biblical writers like Luke for example when he was naming the time periods where Jesus was on the earth, for example at Luke 3:1 he makes mention that it was the 15th year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar when Jesus (the Son of God) was baptized (Luke 3:21), which was the year 29 AD/CE. Tiberius started to reign in 14AD/CE, add 15 years to that and you get 29 AD/CE. So all in all history and science has done very much in proving the existence of God
1 year ago
Last edited at 12:22AM on 4/30/2013
Yes both have disproved God, i should say, any human claims to god, meaning any of the religions found today. History has shown us thousands of gods and religions which have fallen to the way side and forgotten as we advance throughout the years, demonstrating the fallacy of claims of gods, the falsehood of religion and its eventual fate as people become educated as opposed to saying sky god did it. Science has disproved god by disproving the bible and other holy works, in addition to providing use with a natural explanation of much of the observable universe. Also simply because we do not know/haven't learned it yet doesn't mean we then get to say sky god did it because some 2000 yr old scientifically inaccurate book, which said that 7 flicks of bird blood can cure skin diseases, said it. All it means is that we need to find out more, instead of just not finding out and saying sky god did it.