Submit a question to our community and get an answer from real people.
Submit

Person A accuses B of doing something bad w/ showing a proof. Person C says A is slandering B. Person A then says that C is a friend of B.

As you see, person A tries to defend himself only by alleging that C is a friend of B. What kind of fallacy is this statement?

Report as

It is possibly a form of Red Herring. A is trying to distract from the fact that there is no evidence for his claim of B's misconduct by implying bias on C's part.

It could also be considered Ad Hominem, since A is accusing C of bias (a personal attack) to avoid addressing the actual question.

Helpful (1) Fun Thanks for voting Comments (0)
Report as
Add a comment...

what are you talking about like person A person C and person B

Helpful Fun Thanks for voting Comments (1)
Report as
I'm talking about false accusations and how who made the false accusation tries to defend himself - he uses a false statement for that (A says to C: "You're a friend of.B so you cannot defend B."). I want to know the name of this fallacy.
Report as
Add a comment...

If A accuses be then A is the culprit boom, If A doesn't show proof then that is a false statement (:

Helpful Fun Thanks for voting Comments (3)
Report as
I know that if A doesn't show proof then he did a false statement. But I would like to know the name of the second fallacy. Thanks for answer anyway.
Report as
I have no idea.
Report as
Sorry
Report as
Add a comment...

If we would all mind our own business... We wouldn't have to worry about A... B... Or C

Helpful Fun Thanks for voting Comments (0)
Report as
Add a comment...
Do you have an answer?
Answer this question...
Did you mean?
Login or Join the Community to answer