Submit a question to our community and get an answer from real people.
Submit

Am I a freak because I can see dead people?

I can see dead people and I've always felt that im a freak and Im so different and dont have a lot of friends. is it true?

Report as

You are not a freak. You aren't the only one either. You're different and that's a good thing! What would the world be like if we were all the same? Boring. And if you don't have many friends that just means people can't see how amazing and special you are as a human. And that's their loss.

Helpful (16) Fun Thanks for voting Comments (4)
Report as
You're an idiot
Report as
Thank you for the comment but isn't calling somebody an idiot just a bit childish?
Report as
Awesome answer...
Report as
@Harry123 there is no need to be a jerk. I don't believe people can see dead people myself, but I try to be respectful of differing views.
Report as
Add a comment...

You aren't seeing dead people.

Helpful (12) Fun Thanks for voting Comments (0)
Report as
Add a comment...

Those are real people....by the way, what anime do you like?

Helpful Fun Thanks for voting Comments (0)
Report as
Add a comment...

Umm.. i don't think you see dead people. But if you really do.. it makes you who you are and if someone can't accept that, then too bad for them.

Helpful (2) Fun Thanks for voting Comments (0)
Report as
Add a comment...

I think you need more sleep, you're hallucinating. or you've been watching too much bleach.

Helpful (5) Fun (1) Thanks for voting Comments (0)
Report as
Add a comment...

Maybe your a medium? You can see ghosts which are "dead people"

Helpful (2) Fun Thanks for voting Comments (0)
Report as
Add a comment...

No, It does NOT make you a freak.

Helpful (4) Fun Thanks for voting Comments (0)
Report as
Add a comment...

u aren't seeing dead people. u need to see a doc

Helpful (3) Fun (1) Thanks for voting Comments (0)
Report as
Add a comment...

Ghosts are not real you are not seeing dead people. It might just be schizophrenia

Helpful (1) Fun Thanks for voting Comments (0)
Report as
Add a comment...
GirlOfDestiny13

No even if you are just seeing things your not a freak you are you which makes you, you...... did that make any sense? :)

Helpful (1) Fun Thanks for voting Comments (0)
Report as
Add a comment...

They're not dead, they're just hooked on their smartphones and have become tech-zombies.

Helpful (2) Fun (12) Thanks for voting Comments (3)
Report as
So true
Report as
Brraaaiiiinnnnsssss
Report as
Love it!
Report as
Add a comment...
BlueOnBlack

Those are not dead people. You're just seeing some of my ex-gf's. I know.... scary.

Helpful (4) Fun (6) Thanks for voting Comments (4)
Report as
^^thats great (:
Report as
Fantastic answer!
Report as
BlueOnBlack
True story, Sue
Report as
Rofl That's great. I believe you!
Report as
Add a comment...

You need to be seeing doctors.

Helpful (1) Fun (3) Thanks for voting Comments (0)
Report as
Add a comment...

Im sure your not seeing dead people but i think you should put the electronics down and go get some rest if your seeing things .

Helpful (1) Fun Thanks for voting Comments (0)
Report as
Add a comment...

Everybody can see dead people. Not a nice view, but nothing freaky. Btw, if those people are talking or walking around, they are not yet dead.

Helpful (1) Fun (1) Thanks for voting Comments (4)
Report as
Wrong. This is just stupid. Dead people are dead. Period.
Report as
Correct, dead people are dead. But not invisible. ;-)
Report as
He was being funny, @WGRT
Report as
Yep. Sorry.
Report as
Add a comment...

No you are f-ing cool! Like in the sixth sense?

Helpful (1) Fun (1) Thanks for voting Comments (0)
Report as
Add a comment...

Everybody can see dead people. -.- If you mean you're the only one that sees the supposed dead, you need more sleep and/or to stop being so scared of them.

Helpful (1) Fun Thanks for voting Comments (3)
Report as
You know everyone doesn't see dead people. What are you talking about?
Report as
Wrong. This is just stupid. Dead people are dead. Period.
Report as
Do you guys not recognize a joke when you hear it?
Report as
Add a comment...

work in a morgue?

Helpful (2) Fun (3) Thanks for voting Comments (0)
Report as
Add a comment...

yes

Helpful Fun Thanks for voting Comments (0)
Report as
Add a comment...

U need a doctor i dont see dead people but i always imagine slenderman is where im lookking at

Helpful Fun Thanks for voting Comments (0)
Report as
Add a comment...

Care to explain to me what exactly do you experience? How? When? And who do you see?
I'm trying to help you...

Helpful (1) Fun Thanks for voting Comments (0)
Report as
Add a comment...

I watched a show on this, where a few teens, living in different states, had this ability. They didn't like it and didn't know why they had it. When u say u see dead people, do u mean, immediately after they die? Or, they tell u they have been dead a long time? Then, I question that and assume its an evil spirit. But, if u have a special gifting, pray to God about it. Dont consider yourself a freak. Maybe It can be used for the good. In the show I watched, they all met one another and with adults who could help them. They were able to learn to be okay with it and use it for the "good."

Helpful (1) Fun Thanks for voting Comments (3)
Report as
you mean the sixth sense?????
Report as
I don't kniw what u call it but they definitely saw and sensed things. One guy would sense when a person died in the area he was in and it profoundly effected his body. One time. He was out in a boat with his dad fishing. He suddenly felt it in his stomach and his breathing that a boy had been abducted and killed and his body was beneath them in at the bottom if the lake. They told authorities, and sure enough, they investigated and found the boy. He had been missing.
Report as
Wrong. This is just stupid. Dead people are dead. Period.
Report as
Add a comment...

You are not seeing dead people you are seeing deamonds, fallen angles.

Helpful Fun Thanks for voting Comments (1)
Report as
Wrong. This is just stupid. Dead people are dead. Period. And there are no other types of 'spirits'. End of discussion.
Report as
Add a comment...

In tv when they see the dead they have to hide their talents and move a lot. So I guess do that. What do the dead say?

Helpful (1) Fun Thanks for voting Comments (0)
Report as
Add a comment...

You need God to be able to control what you see,and how to deal with it,and don't tell everyone.

Helpful (3) Fun Thanks for voting Comments (0)
Report as
Add a comment...

You need to be delivered from hallucinations I believe. You need to be saved. Read the book of John several times. Keep reading until something happens, but pray before you read. Jesus is able to deliver you from anything. Jesus talked about deliverance. See John 8:31-36, Luke 4:18; 10:19, Mark 11:22-24, Isa. 61:1-3 (corresponds with Lk. 4:18-19). Jesus cast many demons out. Its possible you have one. You should go to a Full Gospel church and join the youth group, and ask for prayer. God bless you. He came to set the captives free. By the way, the "dead people" are evil spirits. People who died went to heaven or hell. When you find Jesus you will be saved, and that's what you need.

Helpful Fun Thanks for voting Comments (3)
Report as
Can we be delivered from evil on our own with Jesus or do ppl have to be present in the name of Jesus.
Report as
Wrong. This is just stupid. Dead people are dead. Period. And God does not exist. Period. End of discussion.
Report as
@WGRT: You are not a very respectful person. I don't believe in mystical experiences either, but I am kind to everyone around me. Even if they believe in things I find incorrect and odd.
Report as
Add a comment...

Maybe demons are following you

Helpful Fun Thanks for voting Comments (0)
Report as
Add a comment...

In a baptize for the dead process, a witness saw a line of spirits waiting for their name to be called. When the day was over, the spirit next in line was very sad. Then they all returned to spirit prison. So I dunno. maybe just maybe you're like the witness

Helpful Fun Thanks for voting Comments (1)
Report as
Wrong. This is just stupid. Dead people are dead. Period.
Report as
Add a comment...

If this question is with sincerity. Then i suggest you see a doctor theres many psychological and physiological conditions that can bring on hallucinations, sleep deprivation and sleep disorders do aswell.

Helpful (2) Fun Thanks for voting Comments (0)
Report as
Add a comment...

yes you are

Helpful Fun Thanks for voting Comments (0)
Report as
Add a comment...

Yes you are different, but your not a freak, you have a gift. Can you communicate with them or do you just see them? My mom has the 6th sense and can "feel" them. If you can communicate with the spirits then put it to good use. Watch the Long Island Medium, people say she's bulls***ing but she's really not.

Helpful (2) Fun Thanks for voting Comments (6)
Report as
BrotherObscura
have you heard of platos cave ''wgrt'' i suggest you read it
Report as
This?:
http://books.google.com/books?id=SZw-AAAAcAAJ&pg=PA228&lpg=PA228&dq=platos+cave+''wgrt''&source=bl&ots=zhbUKKuV6Y&sig=jnLcgXLJgHoqVrud-lDQYNaYVZ0&hl=en&sa=X&ei=97duUpaQI-qg4APBnYCIBw&ved=0CCwQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=platos%20cave%20''wgrt''&f=false

Otherwise no. What is it?
Report as
BrotherObscura
there was a race of men in a cave who are all chained together. they nothing but the cave wall because the light from above shines from behind them. one man is able to get out of the chains. he leaves the cave. and explores the world. when he is finished with his adventures he returns to the caves. after he tells the other men in the chains about what he has seen (the sun, the animals, the sky, etc.) they believe he is out of his mind and they reject him. they do not believe him they cannot imagine such things because its against what they know.
thats the basic summary. and i bet you know what the lesson of this story is and i hope you apply it to your life
Report as
Thank you. That is a wonderful, moralizing story and i'm glad I now know it.
Report as
BrotherObscura
why do i detect a hint of sarcasm...
Report as
No sarcasm.
Report as
Add a comment...

I had a friend that use to see dead people. I told her what I m about to tell you: Dead people are either in heaven or in hell. Any dead people on Earth isnt really people. Its a demon imitating the person that was once alive. And they can get to know even the most intimate secrets of the person who died. She didnt believe me. Sunday, she accepted the Father Son and Holy Spirit. She hasnt seen any dead people or demons since. And she knows the truth. She knows that what I told her is the truth.

Helpful (1) Fun Thanks for voting Comments (36)
Report as
Wrong. This is just stupid.
Report as
Dude, demons can shapeshift into the shape of people, and they can pretend to be sad, afraid, etc. They can tell you anything about the person they re imitating. Anything. And what part of ''my friend could see ghosts, now she knows they are demons'' did you not understand?
Report as
Wrong. Believe in what is reality. Not fairy tales and bedtime stories.
Report as
Third-party tales. Useless.
Report as
If you re atheist, then why even say anything?
Report as
The TRUTH will set you free.
Report as
Science is being held up by crazy theists promoting 6,000 year old earth, etc. Church has too much influence over government. Old testament is a book of hatred, war and killing. Need any more reasons?
Report as
You say the truth shall set you free, the first person to say that was Jesus, and He is the truth. Jesus will set you free. Like Homer Simpson said in one episode ''if we all were a bit more like Flanders, we wouldnt need heaven, because we would already be there''. If everyone was a christian, Earth would be paradise, free of selfishness, hatred, pride, addictions, murder, theft and many other things which the teachings of Jesus are against.
Report as
Wow. You really are blind to what goes on around you, aren't you. If the bible is correct, then it is god that is responsible for everything you just pointed out as bad. There is no more hateful, vicious, war-mongering book than the old testament. You can't believe in Jesus but deny the old testament.
Report as
And the israelites were the worst people too. Bible says they were worse than Sodom and Gomorrah, also, that if Ezekiel had gone to foreigners to preach, they wouldve listened, but Israel wouldnt listen because they were rebels. And what can you expect from people like that? So dont blame it on God.

And you cant just put your sight on the Old Testament and not pay attention to the New Testament. Without the New Testament, the Old Testament is pointless. And without the Old Testament, the New Testament cannot be understood. The two go together. You cant just take one and leave the other behind.
Report as

The Israelites were gods people. Also, any choices they made were because of the way god created them. He put desire in them.

You need to look at both old and new? That's the worst argument I've heard yet. So if Hitler had had a good side and cared for the homeless after the war then it would all have made sense? I don't think so.
Report as
The Israelites were the people God had chosen to be His people. Its the only reason why He didnt wipe them out like Sodom and Gomorrah. And Jesus said it. The reason for their existence is the promise God made to Abraham. But their bad choices were inspired by the other cities that were full of paganism. If anybody is tempted, dont say they are tempted by God, because God cannot be tempted, neither does He tempt anybody. But the Bible reveals who is the tempter in Matthew 4 and 1 Thessalonians 3.

You cant compare God to Hitler. God is perfect, God knows beyond what we can understand. Hitler didnt even know what he was doing.
Report as
Wow. It's hard to argue with someone who follows with blind faith. You need to look at the evidence before you. Open a science magazine. Get involved in helping to explain things that are REAL. You'd be of much more value to society if you were to put the effort into something like explaining to American children that the earth is billions of years old... not 6,000 as many christians in America believe. Use your debating abilities to attack something specific. Something that exists that is real: Racism, Drunk Driving. Use statistics. Logic. Images. Provide options. Convince the young to do the right thing. Stop wasting time trying to do it through a fairytale. As more and more people become aware of the truth, using the 'great pumpkin in the sky' story becomes less and less useful.
Report as
I havent said that the Earth is 6000 years old. And Christ attacked real issues. Now, its actually as people discover the organization of the Universe, and that life cannot begin on its own, that there s a better chance of 1,000,000 monkeys typing Shakespeare s play than any of it happening that more scientists are becoming theists. You see how perfectly assembled and coordinated and arranged the Universe is, you know it was designed.
Report as
I never said that you thought the earth is 6,000. I said it was a better use of your time to argue for the truth. Give up trying to justify a fairy tale. Also, your 1,000,000 monkey argument is invalid. Look it up.
Report as
Look at this. Its in english, it will explain what I just said.

http://youtu.be/jdNhwv1hha0
Report as
Here's why it is invalid.

You are starting with a known value and trying to work backwards. It's like throwing a hundred billion dice, Each ends up in a random position. You don't skew statistics to say that the billion dice had an almost-impossible chance of landing in the order they did. They had to land in SOME order.

You can't work backwards like that. You can't say that we are here and there was an almost impossible chance of that happening. The fact is we are here. You CAN'T work it backwards.

Report as
And why not?
Report as
Your math assumes that there are no other ways to create a universe with intelligent life. You assume that all other possibilities would not lead to where we are - or close enough to where we are. There are likely many, many, many possibilities which would end with intelligent life which would leave someone here contemplating the problem. This exact result is just one of many. Your math made no room for this. For instance, the fact that you and I are debating this right now is just as valid a solution as if the octopus had evolved enough to leave water and continued to evolve and were now the ones debating the problem. Or if silicon-based life forms had evolved instead of carbon-based life forms - and they were debating. These are just a couple of silly examples - but there are many many many other possibilities. If just happened that we - you and I - are the ones that turned out to be debating this. If you narrow the focus quite a bit - you and I are debating. It may have turned out that we did not debate this. These are two completely different situations. Your math only allows for one. You need to allow for both.... and many many millions of other situations. You can't say that the math comes down to only one result because it just happened to turn out that way.
Report as
Well, here s the thing: Octopus can evolve to live on land. That is known. Silicon based life form would require silicon basic structure, which would be called DNA. And it would need to be known if that s possible. But something completely different is that the Universe is designed for life to be possible on Earth. The chances of this being real are so minimal that its unrealistic. Its not just about the way things are, but the exact precision for things to be the way they are. Its not the same making something out of random, or making specific things with specific purposes. Life is like that. The first single cell had to have a genetic code. Try typing randomly. What are the chances you will create a new computer program? So are the chances of things turning out to be. For intelligent life to be. No matter how different it could be. But being this way, shows design. That the Universe and life were designed and with purpose.
Report as
The numbers used in the video do NOT point to a creator. For instance the gravity number is misleading. If gravity were stronger we may have formed on a smaller planet with less gravity. If it were weaker we may have formed on a larger planet with more gravity.

This video presenter can be rude, but please watch the video with an open mind. It is a long video, but it debunks much of the video you provided. Please feel free to independently review the facts stated.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Eo5MdHMNcw
Report as
Actually, Gravity at a moment was stronger when we were closer to the center of the Universe. That s why only simple single cell beings developed during that time. But as the Universe keeps expanding, gravity keeps getting weaker, is the reason the further an object is from the center of the Universe, the faster its sucked away. And the reason for gravity becoming weaker is the reason of the cambrian explosion. But that s only one of the many parameters. A Universe couldve been made. But for molecules to assamble into a program to do something is completely absurd.

Time to open Microsoft word.
Report as
Oh my! Everything I know is a lie! I ve been fooled all this time!... Nah, I m just kidding. Its too long of a video I wasted my day in. And only got to se up to 2 hours 45 minutes. Most of all the time I spent on it, and I say a day because I was doing other things while watching it and had to keep track of it while doing other things. And it doesnt say anything that I didnt already know. It says that the same way rocks can be formed ''random'', but isnt really random, its just the behavior of molecules, in most cases. Says to make one exact rock, it would have to be the exact atoms in the exact order. But whether you have a ton of iron, or just a gram, its still iron. However, as simple as iron lead alloy is, its not the same steel that can be found on Earth as the same steel that can be used for buildings. Something as simple as two molecules in a random order. Now DNA. For something to be alive, it must at least be animated. Rocks, water, are not animated.

Also, God created the rules of thermal dynamics.

Lastly the video said in a moment that if a rock is holding iron, there s no reason to believe the rock was designed to hold iron. So, just because the Universe has life on Earth doesnt mean that it was designed for it. However, if you affect most of the rock except the small part that holds the iron, it doesnt affect the iron. But to change the Universe does has a big effect on life on Earth.
Report as
Sorry, not trying to be rude, but just about everything you said about gravity is incorrect. I'll just address one. The Cambrian Explosion could not be due to changes in gravity. Gravity is due to mass and proximity. Neither of these could change in a short period of time (say a million years). - Unless there was a violent adding or subtracting of mass via a collision. Please feel free to research your information on gravity. If you find any scientific proof I'd be glad to look it over.
Report as
I'm not sure that I'm familiar with the theory that life must be animated. Could you point me to a link? I'm not saying it isn't true. I've just never heard it before. And water seems to often be very animated.

Here's your answer to your monkey point. It would be an unbelievable trick for molecules to form into a specific rock. If you start with a single rock then you could say that it is almost unbelievable that the rock formed in just that way, with each molecule being in that exact position. Unbelievable. But in fact there are many rocks, each with it's own shape and size. The odds of all of these rocks being formed in just the shape and size that each has is unbelievable. But the fact is you are starting from the end point. The unbelievable part goes away when you just say that rocks formed. We don't need to include the exact shape and size of each. Just that they formed.
Report as
Well, the Universe is constantly expanding. The more it expands, the faster it expands. And probably things were different when it was more dense.

Water can seem animated, but its actually an inanimate object. Robots are closer to life. But life is much more than just automatic animation.

You know what? There are many shapes of rocks, as there are many shapes of life, and even many shapes of people. But its not about the shape, its about the chemical composition. Its easier to make a rock out of helium than to create artificial life. And by artificial life, I mean real living things that were made ina laboratory from scratch. Not using the DNA of any animal or plant, because each living being has its own blueprints. But what was the DNA of the first living single cell ever? Its known that with the right gasses and lightning, we can create DNA, but the point is we cant make a living being out of that DNA. The other way it goes is different molecules in different conditions, but we cant make life with what we have, much less with other components and conditions. Yes, we ve created robots, computers and etc, but none of that stuff is alive. It does not have a choice of its own. And even if that was life, who wouldve programmed the first single cell? What did it do? How did it became more life, and why? What guided it to do whatever it was that it did?
Report as
The universe IS constantly expanding. But that doesn't mean that gravity was different. Again, if there is any scientific evidence of this I would like to see it. There may have been differences with an expanding universe, but that in no way suggests that there is a god. In fact it does just the opposite. God wouldn't have needed to go through a long process to create the earth.

Because we haven't made life in a lab doesn't mean it isn't possible. We can't make a black hole or make the sun spin in the opposite direction. That doesn't mean that those things are impossible or that they didn't form naturally. We just don't have the scientific know-how or the resources to create life from scratch. BTW, we are coming closer all the time. Check the research. It's quite interesting.

Because we don't know the exact DNA of the first living life form does not mean it didn't exist. I would think that we will get closer and closer as DNA links (between various life forms) become more and more advanced.

In order to discuss the first living cell further we would need to have a specific definition of life. You have mentioned animation, choice, programming,

It is impossible to determine how rare life is until we understand exactly what it takes to cause the chemicals to form. Life may form very easily. It may be that new life forms are constantly being overwhelmed by our carbon-based, DNA life. It is completely dominant on Earth.
Report as
God didnt need to go through a long process to create the Earth, but He likes to take His time. We cant make suns or black holes, but we understand how they work. Its not that we dont understand how molecules work, its that we do. And understanding molecules is what shows the virtual impossibility of life emerging on its own. Its not that we dont know the exact DNA of the first living cell. Chances are that we do. Its that DNA doesnt just become alive. You cant revive dead cells, much less make life out of plain DNA. And why dont other carbon-based life forms emerge? After all, ''we did''. And the conditions for carbon-based life are better now.
Report as
It's difficult to discuss multiple items in one statement. Here goes. 1) God taking his time is just a statement with no justification. Not even in the bible. 2) We don't understand black holes at all. The center of the black hole is a mystery. The event horizon may or may not be a never-ending information sink best represented by string-theory. 3) It is much more reasonable to believe that life emerged on it's own than to believe that a fairy-godfather created it just so that he could watch humans dance the worship dance. 4) We don't know the DNA of the first living creature. I'm not sure what your point is. To discuss this we need a good definition of what life is and how we would differentiate between a group of chemicals vs. a living creature. Without that your argument would just be.. well it didn't have thought...or it doesn't breath. A PRECISE definition is required. If it can't be defined then science will never be able to say how it was first created. 5) Here's a link to a website that shows the probable progression from non-life to life. Remember, this is just the probable progression. Even if it is not correct that does not mean there is a greater power. It just means there are other ways for it to happen. 6) I'ts very possible that other life forms haven't emerged in great numbers either because carbon-based life forms are either better suited to life or are currently much more numerous. Either way, existing carbon-based life forms are pervasive. They would likely dominate and likely distroy any other type of life form that was struggling to survive. I'm not saying that this is happening. I'm just saying that it is a much more believable possibility than a greater power. There are likely dozens of reasonable explanations. One more thing on this. It is possible that life has IN THE EXACT SAME WAY hundreds or thousands of times. These new life streams may or may not have evolved, and may or may not have been overcome by existing life. 7) There's no evicence that I know of tha
Report as
7) There's no evicence that I know of that conditions are better now than they were in the past... other than a lower frequency of debris from space. In order to prove this statement you would need to provide the scientific evidence of how life forms. Does it need lightning? Volcanic properties? Debris from space? Specific chemicals mixing in specific ways over thousands of years? Shallow pools of water? Deep pools of water?
Report as
Actually, its that He did, and that He does, that shows He likes to take His time.

Black holes are stars that collapse and produce strong gravity that pulls in whatever comes near by.

Why is life emerging on its own more believable than God having created it?

We do know. Out of what is believed to be the gasses of the early atmosphere, DNA has been made. Even tho, some believe one of the elements was not in Earth at that time.

Science defines life as something that develops, feeds itself, reproduces and dies. But a common characteristic of life is it tries to keep itself alive.

According to science, DNA forms through concentration of chemicals and ionization. But we have DNA. Its everywhere. Not created the same way, but from many life forms. What carbon-based life forms require, well, look around you. The planet is completely populated by carbon-based life forms.
Report as
I'd like to say that I'm enjoying our conversation.

I would appreciate it if you could use the number system I set up (or something similar). I'm getting old and I find myself having to go back to what we wrote previously quite often. :->
Report as
1) So god took billions of years to create the earth, let hundreds of billions of predators violently rip into hundreds of billions of prey before man even got here. Let our direct ancestors fall victim to deadly disease and predators. Then he let man survive hundreds of thousands of years? Millions of years?... before he finally sent his message of love to the world?

2) I know quite well the overarching theory of WHAT a black hole is and HOW it is created. Some of the parts that are not known are, as I said, what is inside and how does the event horizon store information.

3) Because we have extremely strong evidence of how life evolved... going back until the very first life form. You may be right. It may turn out that at that point a creator stepped in and performed magic. Can you even envision it? It seems much more believable to envision a simple chemical reaction. A simple step that we merely haven't found yet. A certain mixture of chemicals at a certain temperature. Perhaps energy from lighting. Almost any scenario involving such a mixture, no matter how intricate, should be held out as the most reasonable suggestion to anyone who looks at the possibilities with an open mind.

4) We don't know. I suspect we may be able to assume the basic structure, but we have no way of knowing the details. Was it flat? Round? Opaque? We don't know the details. And there were more elements available than just what was in the atmosphere As one example, although I doubt it is required for the creation of life, gold. It was available but not in the atmosphere. The actual chemicals would be anything available in a particular liquid. Perhaps water. We don't know for sure. As one silly example, it may have been liquid rock (a volcano). It would be interesting to know what element was apparently missing. I'm OK with that definition of life. I don't think we need to concern ourselves with trying to stay alive. Unless it adds something to the conversation.
Report as
6) From answers.yahoo,com:

The reigning hypothesis is that RNA preceded DNA. DNA is a phenomenally self-correcting replicator, but it is a terrible catalyst. Proteins are great catalysts but are lousy replicators. But RNA is pretty good at both catalysis and replication. So a very simple system of self-replicating energy-metabolizing chemical life can be supported using RNA alone (this has been demonstrated in the lab).

This is called the RNA World hypothesis, and basically holds that a simple self-replicating pre-cellular chemical life form emerged based on RNA only. Then came proteins that used the RNA as "scaffolding" to form, and which dramatically improved the efficiency of catalytic reactions. And later came DNA as a multiple short RNA sequences can be represented using a longer, and far more stable DNA strand ... which allowed for more complex organisms that were basically the cooperation of many different RNA-protein systems.
Report as
Sorry, could you rephrase the following. Please also state which point you are addressing. Thanks.

According to science, DNA forms through concentration of chemicals and ionization. But we have DNA. Its everywhere. Not created the same way, but from many life forms. What carbon-based life forms require, well, look around you. The planet is completely populated by carbon-based life forms.
Report as
1. Well, God knows about that, we dont. The Bible focuses on humans and God. I only know, God knows why, we dont.

2. what is inside a black hole? Well, obviously everything it pulled in, lol. Perhaps the event horizon is just things becoming too pulled in or to compressed to send anything out. Maybe lots of antimatter. Maybe what goes in becomes antimatter.

3. maybe God used natural ways to create life. God does a lot of things using natural ways. That s why the Bible says He works in mysterious ways. God does that to test our faith. Because God testing our faith is what makes it grow and what makes it stronger. But it depends on the person. And many times people just dont wanna collaborate.

4.Well, staying alive is something every living being that isnt sick tries to do. This adds to the consciousness of life and it being mnore complex for molecules to do it on its own.

6. So RNA... but now what is needed to know is if RNA can appear by itself, like we know that DNA can, or if it is only possible with life that is already existent. What I was saying is there s the DNA, there s the conditions to sustain life, why doesnt it emerge like it did before? But nvm that
Report as
Add a comment...

Don't listen to the people saying your seeing demons stuff, (and don't focus on those negative ideas or it will bring negative things forward) you are perfectly fine!:) lots of people see spirits, energy, angles, etc... Not to say it isn't hard sometimes when you are a see-er, but just remember is it a gift no matter if you want it or not! Try to embrace it and find the positive in it. Don't listen to the people who put you down because they don't understand what your seeing. DO NOT medicate yourself, you are not insane...but you know that. Good luck :) your fine. no worries. (watch some "AskTeal" Videos on you-tube, she explains a lot in terms of after life, spirituality, and energy. She has a variety of very good informative videos.

Helpful (8) Fun Thanks for voting Comments (0)
Report as
Add a comment...

It all depends on how you look or act ,the answer could possibly be yes!

Helpful Fun Thanks for voting Comments (0)
Report as
Add a comment...

I can see dead people too! There usually is at least one at every funeral. In all seriousness, stop deluding yourself.

Helpful Fun Thanks for voting Comments (0)
Report as
Add a comment...

you can not see dead people

Helpful Fun Thanks for voting Comments (0)
Report as
Add a comment...

Be a scientist and experiment with what you see and record their behaviors, at the end the ultimate purpose of being alive is to record and analyze data.

Helpful (1) Fun Thanks for voting Comments (0)
Report as
Add a comment...

Stop looking at your mirror for once!

Mi Vida. Mi Madrid.

Helpful Fun Thanks for voting Comments (0)
Report as
Add a comment...

You can't see dead people. According to he Bible we don't have a soul. We are a soul. Gen. 2:7. The Bible says when you die you return to dust. Gen. 3:19. Also at Ecc. 9: 5,6 says the dead know nothing, can do nothing and have no memory. So how can you see them after they are dead? If you do see apparitions, they are demons and never were human. Satan wants us to believe in the immortal soul.

Helpful Fun Thanks for voting Comments (0)
Report as
Add a comment...

I used to see dead people all the time ...

When I worked at the morgue.

Helpful Fun Thanks for voting Comments (0)
Report as
Add a comment...

It's silly to feel like because you sense or can see ghosts its a big thing. It is not at all uncommon and people are grounded in their daily realities and not plugged into the spiritual so much. Frankly the bible says there are spirits and principalities and we are to have nothing to do with them. I usually understand my personal space, and tell them to moved on if needed. I pray alot though so my space is holy ground. Understand where all true power comes from and that is God. So make that all important connection and have peace. Do not dwell on the occult.

Helpful Fun Thanks for voting Comments (0)
Report as
Add a comment...

you cant see dead people, you would be psychotic, with schizophrenia you would probably be closer to schizoaffective disorder which would have grandiose delusions attached to the manic side or paranoid delusions attached to the depressed side. on both you wouldnt see only one delusion object. you do my good person have aspd, borderline personality disorder hint being the fact you know this isnt true (seeing dead people), and you know this, and you asked impling you are a "freak" which is a passive way of trying to implying something opposite to draw attation.

Helpful Fun Thanks for voting Comments (0)
Report as
Add a comment...

Well if your being serious I believe you. And no I don' t think your a freak, i think it would be really cool. Maybe you could try being friends with the dead:). Also for the people that don't believe in ghosts and paranormal activity maybe you should watch the exorcist... it is by the way based on a true story.

Helpful Fun Thanks for voting Comments (0)
Report as
Add a comment...
Do you have an answer?
Answer this question...
Did you mean?
Login or Join the Community to answer
Popular Searches