Ad misericordiam is an appeal to pity and is used in rhetoric to argue a point based on an emotional response pertaining to unrelated evidence. The intended emotional response is pity, and the method is considered a logical fallacy.
Though it is classified as a fallacy, that is not to say that ad misericordiam is not practiced successfully at times. Examples may be found in political speeches, legal defenses and prosecutions, and any situation in which a person wishes to gain permission for something or to be rewarded a title or position.
A hypothetical example of ad misericordiam involves a man pulled over by a police officer for speeding. The offender tries to get out of paying a ticket by telling the officer he was speeding because his grandmother is dying in the hospital, and he is on his way to see her. Alternatively, he could say that he is sorry for speeding, but he really cannot afford a speeding ticket because he just lost his job. Both of these arguments are attempts to evoke a feeling of pity in the officer. Neither argument is a logical defense against the man's guilt. In fact, the man never denies being guilty. Instead, he uses unrelated factors to render the act excusable.Learn More
Despite his depiction in a 1972 film, John "Jeremiah" Johnston is unlikely to have engaged in a long feud with the Crow Indians. A mountain man, soldier and lawman, Johnston served as a private in the Union Army in St. Louis during the Civil War.Full Answer >
Niels Bohr was a Danish physicist born in the late 19th century. He was awarded a Nobel Prize in 1922 in recognition of his work on radiation emission and atomic structures.Full Answer >
"When Heaven and Earth Changed Places" is a book published in 1989. The book is written as a personal memoir by Le Ly Hayslip, with assistance from writer Jay Wurts. The memoir recounts Hayslip's youth in war-torn Vietnam, her escape to the United States and her eventual return to Vietnam.Full Answer >
The law of definite proportions states that a chemical compound always contains the same proportion of elements by mass. That is to say, changing the scale of a sample of a compound does not alter its proportionate composition.Full Answer >