The pros of representative democracy include that elected officials are often better informed and the government is more efficient, whereas some cons include that citizens don’t participate directly and elected officials have the ability to ignore their constituents once elected. Representative democracy is one where instead of direct democracy where all of the people in an area make all of the decisions, the people elect officials to make the decisions on their behalf.
The first advantage to this approach is that it tends to be more efficient. Many decisions, such as those that pertain to war, must be made quickly in order for them to be effective. As a result, there often is insufficient time to gather all of the citizens of an area together to take a mass vote on such issues, especially in large populations. According to ActivatingDemocracy.com. another advantage is that ordinary citizens often just don’t have any interest in politics. They are not informed on the issues, whereas elected officials specifically study to be informed. A downside of representative democracy though, is that it’s easy for citizens to be manipulated by groups that seek power. In a representative democracy, groups with resources like education, money and influence have the ability to take advantage over those that don’t.Learn More
A laissez-faire leadership style gives workers flexibility to complete tasks without constant supervision and direction. It works well with employees who are knowledgeable and experienced with their roles. With workers who lack experience or time-management skills, laissez-faire leadership may lead to inefficiency or poor results.Full Answer >
The mileage reimbursement rate for governmental purposes in fiscal year 2014 was 54 cents per every kilometer for the first 5,000 kilometers. After 5,000 kilometers, the rate drops to 48 cents per kilometer.Full Answer >
A government creates and enforces the laws that protect the rights and lives of citizens and discourages crime by punishing delinquents. Government provides an ordered, systematic way to ensure the safety of the citizenry. Without a government, people would be less likely to respect contracts and agreements with one another due to the lack of an objective way to settle disputes.Full Answer >
The Anti-Federalists believed in more rights for the individual than for the state, asserting that the biggest threat to freedom was a powerful federal government. They believed that even the balance of power between the three branches of government was not enough to prevent the government from becoming tyrannical. They wanted to see a Bill of Rights added to the proposed Constitution.Full Answer >