Q:

Why can nationalism be a unifying force?

A:

Quick Answer

Nationalism can be a unifying force for a number of reasons. Nationalism is an extreme pride and devotion to one's country. Nationalists believe that the interests of the nation as a whole and the protection of its land and people is of the utmost importance and should be an integral part of foreign policy.

Nationalism can be a unifying force for a number of reasons. Nationalism is an extreme pride and devotion to one's country. Nationalists believe that the interests of the nation as a whole and the protection of its land and people is of the utmost importance and should be an integral part of foreign policy. According to the Huffington Post, the concept of nationalism was produced during the 18th century.

Know More

Full Answer

Nationalism unites individuals that share a common nation under the belief that the benefit of the nation as a whole is of the utmost importance in all matters. The President of the United States is charged with maintaining a high-level of nationalistic pride, as he is the embodiment of the nation. Some people are wary of nationalism when it becomes too seeded in the fabric of society. For example, when Germany was under the leadership of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party, German nationalism was at its peak. When nationalism is promoted to the extreme, minority populations or foreign-born citizens can possibly be exploited by the dominant belief system. After the attacks on the World Trade Center in 2011, nationalism in the United States peaked. Recently, nationalism has been criticized in the U.S., as it creates xenophobia and fear of strangers.

Learn more about Types of Government

Related Questions

  • Q:

    What is a "nation builder"?

    A:

    The term "nation builder" is commonly used to refer to a person, often a politician, who has been significantly instrumental in the development of a country. Their accomplishments might include setting standards of leadership or governmental conduct or else involvement in important social advocacy work, such as the advancement of women's rights.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:
  • Q:

    What would happen if there were no government?

    A:

    A society that has no government would be considered an anarchy. Government mediates disputes between people, provides basic services like roads, education and national security and enforces laws to discourage wrongdoing from being committed. All of these would not exist in a true anarchy.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:
  • Q:

    What are the pros and cons of aristocracy?

    A:

    Aristocracy can be seen in both a positive and negative light since it can be considered a pro to allow the most educated people in a nation to make the biggest decisions regarding that nation, yet it can be considered a con to allow a few people to make important decisions for an entire people. In today's democratic world, the term aristocracy is typically considered negative because it often means that a small, wealthy portion of the population is controlling the entire nation, leading to a disparity in individual rights.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:
  • Q:

    What is the explanation of Calhoun's theory of nullification?

    A:

    The theory of nullification, introduced by John C. Calhoun, claims that a state in theory has the right to nullify or invalidate any federal law that the state deems unconstitutional. This theory is no longer in use today, but was a large factor in many legal cases and situations prior to and during the Civil War era.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:

Explore