State or federal government bring criminal actions against parties that are accused of violating the law and civil actions are non-criminal acts brought against those accused of violating private rights. Examples of criminal law include murder, kidnapping, embezzlement or theft. Civil law examples include breach of contract, compensation-related cases and fraud.Know More
In criminal law, it is not the victim's responsibility to bring a case and is punished by the police or state. Civil law is where the victim of a crime can ask for restitution and fines when the defendant has not carried out a legal duty. The easiest way to differentiate the two types of law is by looking at the party that is allowed to bring any proceedings against the other party. Only federal or state governments can bring criminal proceedings against a party and are doing so on behalf of the public.
The state or federal government, as well as companies or citizens can start civil proceedings. When the state or federal government do this, it is in order to benefit the citizens of the state or country and when a private party starts a civil case, it is doing so for its own benefits. The criminal law's aim is to prevent people from intentionally harming one another and to punish those guilty of violating the law. Civil law's aim is not to punish the defendant, but to compensate a wronged party. This can be by demanding that the defendant complete or cease a particular action, or by monetary compensation.Learn more about Law
While tort law aims to compensate a victim, criminal law aims to punish a criminal. In addition, while individuals or organizations pursue tort cases, it is usually the government that pursues criminal cases. There are also differences in terms of outcomes, like imprisonment versus compensation.Full Answer >
Common law and statutory law are two systems of law used in the American judicial system. Common law is based on prior court decisions while statutory law is made by the legislature.Full Answer >
According to the University of Louisiana at Lafayette, natural law refers to those laws that derive their legitimacy from moral reasoning and are based on what is believed to serve the best interests of the common good while positive laws are those that obtain their legitimacy through legislative means and are enforced by civil or political authority. Based on a strict interpretation of natural law, any legal statute that conflicts with natural law is unjust and should not be obeyed. According to positive legal theory, the legitimacy of a law is not relevant to its morality, but rather stems from the power of the authority that enacted it.Full Answer >
Equity establishes justice if common law is inadequate in certain circumstances, according to Cornell University Law School. The equity route is only an option when legal recourse has been exhausted.Full Answer >