Q:

How does doctrine of precedent work?

A:

The legal doctrine of precedent is used when a court system decides a case based on a previous case with similar circumstances. Preceding cases should persuade current jurisprudence to act in a similar fashion, according to USLegal. Precedent allows for stability and predictability in legal systems, and it follows the norms and mores of the community in which the court serves.

Cornell University Law School calls the doctrine of precedent "stare decisis," or "to stand by things decided." American courts cite this Latin term when invoking precedents in cases pertaining to similar issues that have already been decided. In general, courts side with the preceding case law, but not always.

One prevalent example of American courts following precedent involves Roe v. Wade. In the 1992 case Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, the U.S. Supreme Court cited stare decisis dozens of times when it handed down decisions regarding five abortion laws in Pennsylvania on the books since 1982, according to Cornell University Law School.

Australian law cites examples of cases wherein high-level courts reversed previous decisions, even under similar circumstances. A controversial 2008 case, Imbree v. McNeilly, overturned a 1986 case regarding a learning driver's responsibility for a passenger's injury, according to associate law professor Matthew Harding from The University of Melbourne. Originally, Australian courts ruled that a learning driver is responsible for another person's injuries if the driver is negligent. In 2008, that decision was reversed.


Is this answer helpful?

Similar Questions

  • Q:

    What is the doctrine of respondeat superior?

    A:

    The legal doctrine of "respondeat superior" is a concept in tort law when a court system holds an employer legally responsible for the acts of an employee if negligence occurs within the scope of the employee's work, according to Cornell University's Legal Information Institute. A 2002 article in the Southern Medical Journal reveals that a health care provider may be held negligent, rather than a doctor, in some circumstances.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:
  • Q:

    What is the doctrine of judicial precedent?

    A:

    The doctrine of judicial precedent means that judges can refer back to previous decisions to help decide similar cases where the law and facts are alike. This doctrine is concerned with the influence and value of past decisions of case law and the judge's prior legal experience.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:
  • Q:

    What is a binding precedent?

    A:

    Also referred to as mandatory precedent, binding precedent is an existing law to which a court is expected to adhere. All inferior or lower courts are expected to follow the laws of a superior court in a particular jurisdiction.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:
  • Q:

    What is the importance of a precedent?

    A:

    In a court of law, a precedent is important because it gives the judges a base guideline to work from when deciding the outcome of a case. Many of the precedents laid down for the courts to follow have been around for over 200 years.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:

Explore