Jury nullification is an example of common law, according to StreetInsider.com. Jury veto power occurs when a jury has the right to acquit an accused person regardless of guilt under the law.Know More
Wikipedia claims that jury nullification took root in the common law courts of England during the Middle Ages. Jury veto power was more firmly established in the Magna Carta of 1215, which declared that a jury comprising of a defendant's peers must issue a verdict. Even though early jurors faced imprisonment or fines for delivering a wrong verdict, there are cases in which juries acquitted a person regardless of the law or court instruction.
StreetInsider.com notes the most notable jury veto case occurred over 300 years ago, when jurors refused to convict William Penn for preaching Quakerism. The jurors disregarded the law and ignored instructions from the judge to deliver a guilty verdict. The jurors were punished, but they addressed their grievances to another court. Their punishments were overturned, and Chief Justice John Vaughan ruled that jurors had every right to vote according to their convictions, which also set the stage for the freedoms of assembly, speech and religion. The founding fathers of the United States adopted these principles, including the English common law notion of jury nullification. Under the American legal system, jurors also cannot be punished for any verdicts handed down to a defendant, and they are not obligated to provide an explanation for their verdict.Learn more about Law
Equity establishes justice if common law is inadequate in certain circumstances, according to Cornell University Law School. The equity route is only an option when legal recourse has been exhausted.Full Answer >
In American history, the doctrine of nullification supports states' rights to nullify federal laws that states deem to be unconstitutional, according to Pearson Education. This theory was promulgated by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison in the late 1790s. The nullification crisis of the 1820s revolved around South Carolina's objection to federal tariffs on English textiles, because the state felt the tariffs benefited industrial states in the North.Full Answer >
The idea of being innocent until proven guilty does not appear in any of the Constitutional amendments, but is, in fact, a part of common law. It is not a right granted by the Constitution.Full Answer >
As of 2015, Illinois does not recognize common law marriages, according to FindLaw. Many states do recognize common law marriage when a couple lives together for a designated number of years, intends to be married and holds themselves as husband and wife.Full Answer >