Martin Luther King, Jr., John F. Kennedy, Gandhi and Winston Churchill could all be considered charismatic. Charisma is defined as having an appeal that draws people and helps an individual attain power over them, so the definition of charismatic is, to some extent, subjective.Know More
According to Psychology Today, there is no consensus about whether or not charisma is a natural quality or one that is learned. Charisma involves excellent communication, which is a learned skill, but it also involves being able to appeal to people on a more spiritual level. Good charismatic leaders are able to identify what people seek and offer solutions that appeal to them in a way that causes them to want to follow and support them.
In essence, charismatic leadership focuses on the resolve to take on a cause more so than on the actual performance of the leader. Since a charismatic leader's performance isn't really evaluated, there is no consensus as to whether charismatic leaders are actually effective leaders. Experts suggest another type of leadership, transformational leadership, which involves elements of charismatic leaders, is actually more effective. Transformational leadership not only involves motivating followers but inspiring them to respond intellectually and to help the leader devise solutions.Learn more about Types of Government
The laissez-faire leadership style was adopted by some American Presidents and was most popular before the great depression. Two of the leaders who used this style of leadership were President Martin Van Buren and President Herbert Hoover.Full Answer >
Some examples of famous charismatic leaders include Winston Churchill, Martin Luther King Jr., Mahatma Gandhi, Mother Teresa and Margaret Thatcher. Charismatic leaders are generally those people who possess certain qualities that inspire people and encourage devotion to a certain cause.Full Answer >
The United States trade sanctions on Cuba are considered by many to be an act of imperialism. Imperialism is the tendency of one or more countries to impose some degree of force on a country of lesser world status in order to gain resources, land or population. Cuba is one of many countries that has been affected by what some call United States imperialism.Full Answer >
Vatican City, the Islamic Republic of Iran and the many countries that use Islamic law as the basis for their legal systems are considered to be theocracies by many scholars. These countries are considered theocratic because they adhere to the definition of theocracy, which is a governmental system in which religion or divine guidance is the primary source of political guidance.Full Answer >