According to American Songwriter, a non-exclusive contract allows a second party to publish or distribute intellectual or creative work, but it does not prohibit the owner of the work from selling her work to other vendors. Non-exclusive contracts are generally used to prevent an individual from being locked into a restrictive contract before their work gains popularity.
American Songwriter explains that non-exclusive contracts protect artists from being taken advantage of in the early stages of their work while allowing them to get their products out to a larger audience. Although this type of contract is frequently seen in artistic industries, especially the music industry, it is not uncommon in other professional fields.
Non-exclusive publishing contracts have become an increasingly popular option in the writing industry, as well. Wheatmark discusses the importance of having the option to sign up with a larger company for marketing and promotional benefits without signing over the rights to a written work for the remainder of its life.
Unknown authors make deals with publishers before their work is known, driving down their pay. Without a non-exclusive contract, this low rate of pay remains in effect for a given work even after content creators become famous. Non-exclusive contracts allow authors to spread their work to publishers who reach a broader audience than the author is able to on her own, explains Wheatmark. Authors gain popularity this way without losing control of their work or their profits in the future.Learn More
To select a lawyer for a wrongful termination case, search for a lawyer with employment law experience through an online legal directory, a local legal clinic such as Legal Aid Society, or through a union or professional association, says NOLO. After receiving referrals, choose a few lawyers to research further.Full Answer >
Court-ordered community service allows a person convicted of a crime to work for a community in exchange for a reduction of fines or imprisonment, or both, according to FindLaw. Sometimes, this alternative type of sentence can be substituted for an entire prison sentence.Full Answer >
The Dred Scott vs. Sanford case is credited with driving the nation closer to civil war and the eventual abolishment of slavery, as PBS explains. The 1857 ruling further polarized abolitionists and proponents of slavery by determining that black Americans had no right to sue in federal court because they couldn't obtain citizenship whether or not they became free. Former slave owner, Chief Justice Roger Taney, oversaw the decision.Full Answer >
A contract is null and void when it can no longer be legally enforced. If one party to the contract gives an indication that it is unable to hold up its end, the other party may claim an anticipatory breach of contract. If the agreement is unconscionable or grossly unfair to one party, or one party commits fraud, the contract may be void.Full Answer >