There are different arguments for and against the continued use of the electoral college in elections. Those in favor of the electoral college maintain that it better represents the choices of the nation as a whole and eliminates the need to recount the votes of the entire country, lessening the chances for election fraud.
The electoral college was developed as a way to give each state, no matter the size of the population, an equal voice in elections and the Senate. This allows for states with smaller populations, such as Wyoming, to have just as much voice in elections as larger states like California and New York.
One argument against the electoral college is that candidates only campaign in larger cities and states since those votes in the electoral college mean more. Another con from opponents is that the electoral college was created as an agreement for states that had the three-fifths compromise. This legislation skewed the population numbers in states and gave slave-heavy states such as Virginia more say with its larger population, according to a Washington Post piece. More arguments against the continued use of an electoral college include the uneven value of votes in different states and that the electoral college vote overrides popular vote.Learn More
To find out where you can cast your voting ballot, enter your address into an online voting database several weeks before an election or by calling your county recorder's office anytime.Full Answer >
Though they are U.S. citizens, Puerto Rican citizens cannot cast votes in U.S. presidential elections. They can vote in a presidential primary, and they send delegates to the political conventions. The same is true for the other U.S. territories of Guam, American Samoa and the Virgin Islands.Full Answer >
The electoral college officially elects the President of the United States. Though American citizens registered to vote cast ballots for a particular Presidential candidate, they are really voting for a group of electors from their state.Full Answer >
Out of a field of five candidates, William H. Crawford of Georgia was not a favorite son in the 1824 presidential election. Favorite-son candidates, those supported by their home state delegations, had a negotiating edge in the regionally driven political world of early 19th-century America.Full Answer >