The pros of having a republic type of government, include widespread cultivation of civic virtue, increased liberty and just laws, while the cons include mass corruption and government inefficiency. In general, the structure of a republic safeguards people against government abuse better than an autocratic system; however, the dispersion of power makes public action less decisive.Know More
According to the Encyclopaedia Britannica, a republic is based on the principles of representative government, citizenship and popular sovereignty. Because the people are the ultimate source of political power and government officials are answerable to both the people and the law, there is a reduced risk of government abuse. The people, acting through their representatives for their self-interest, are more likely than an autocrat to enact just laws that benefit the majority and not only the one or the few.
According to the Center for Civic Education, the opportunity for citizens to participate in government within a republic allows for the population in general to develop publicly beneficial civic virtues like honesty, responsibility, patriotism and duty.
The Center for Civic Education also explains that the problem with a republic is that political decisions become weaker when power is dispersed through many levels: executives, courts, legislatures. Instead of acting as a united whole toward a clear objective, government becomes distracted by the many conflicting purposes of the distinct factions that control the different branches. In addition, there is a danger that the citizens lose sight of the public good and vote according to their personal whims, sacrificing liberty and others' rights in the process.Learn more about Types of Government
Isolationism is the philosophy of remaining apart from the affairs of another group. This is especially true as it regards the affairs of a country. The main benefit of this approach is that a country tends to avoid costly and deadly wars.Full Answer >
Aristocracy can be seen in both a positive and negative light since it can be considered a pro to allow the most educated people in a nation to make the biggest decisions regarding that nation, yet it can be considered a con to allow a few people to make important decisions for an entire people. In today's democratic world, the term aristocracy is typically considered negative because it often means that a small, wealthy portion of the population is controlling the entire nation, leading to a disparity in individual rights.Full Answer >
The main benefit of socialism is the smaller amount of inequalities between all citizens, but socialism can lead to communism, which has been shown to fail in the past. There are many definitions of socialism but, in general, a socialist society has a larger and more powerful government that is meant to distribute tax revenue and goods evenly.Full Answer >
A laissez-faire leadership style gives workers flexibility to complete tasks without constant supervision and direction. It works well with employees who are knowledgeable and experienced with their roles. With workers who lack experience or time-management skills, laissez-faire leadership may lead to inefficiency or poor results.Full Answer >