The main purpose of the system of checks and balances in the United States Constitution is to ensure that no one branch of the American government becomes more powerful than the others. This is also referred to as the separation of powers. While this model's roots can be traced back to ancient Greece, the American Constitution borrows heavily on this idea from the French Enlightenment philosopher, Baron de Montesquieu.Know More
The three branches of government include the executive, judiciary and legislative. The executive branch includes the president, the judiciary includes the Supreme Court and the legislative includes Congress. Power is limited in many ways, but an example of checks and balances with regard to the legislative branch includes the president's ability to veto a law that is passed by Congress. Similarly, the judicial branch, or the Supreme Court, may deem a law that is passed by Congress to be unconstitutional. While the president appoints members to the Supreme Court, the appointments have to be approved by Congress.
There are many roles of each branch of government, but every function of each role is designed so that it is checked over by another branch of government. For example, while the judiciary branch can proclaim interpretations of laws by Congress, they cannot change them.Learn more about Branches of Government
The president's power is limited by a system of checks and balances written into the United States Constitution. The legislative and judicial branches have specific power to deny or impede the executive branch's actions.Full Answer >
A system of checks and balances prevents one branch of government from becoming too powerful. The Constitution provides the framework by which each of the three branches of government--executive, legislative and judicial--can resist encroachments and check the other two branches.Full Answer >
The system of checks and balances is designed to keep any one branch of the U.S. government from becoming too powerful. It gives each branch specific ways to counter actions of the others, ensuring that no single section ever has complete control.Full Answer >
Judicial review is controversial because an unelected group is charged with interpreting the Constitution and thereby the validity of laws affecting the populous.Judicial review should be void of all political bias, however, the power granted to a body that is not accountable to the public can be seen as an imbalance in the checks and balances intended by the three branch system of democracy in the United States.Full Answer >