Q:

What was the Salomon v. Salomon case?

A:

Salomon v. Salomon was a case in Great Britain in 1897 that established the concept of the "corporate veil," according to McGill University. This case established the corporation as a different entity than the people within the corporation, specifically the shareholders. The case also created legal liability against the corporation instead of an individual person.

Salomon v. Salomon involved the Salomon family, who owned the majority of shares in a leather company, according to The National Archives of the United Kingdom. After a strike, the business lost profits and went bankrupt. The value of the corporation at the time of insolvency was below the value of the debts. Creditors sued the individual shareholders for the rest of the funds. Even though the majority owner of the company was one family, the House of Lords held that a corporation is separate from the individuals. Only the corporation held the debt; the individual shareholders did not hold the debt. As part of a legal incorporation, the liability was more minimal than that of a partnership or sole proprietorship, according to Examination Preparation Services.

Though Salomon v. Salomon was a case in English common law, courts in other countries cite the case as part of corporate law, according to WIkipedia. Subsequent cases, however, limit the corporate veil and provide instances for lifting it.


Is this answer helpful?

Similar Questions

  • Q:

    What is the definition of "corporate veil"?

    A:

    The term "corporate veil" refers to the concept that a publicly traded company's shareholders are shielded from liability connected to that company's actions. If the company incurs corporate debts or breaks laws, the corporate veil concept dictates that shareholders should not be held liable for those errors.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:
  • Q:

    What is the doctrine of respondeat superior?

    A:

    The legal doctrine of "respondeat superior" is a concept in tort law when a court system holds an employer legally responsible for the acts of an employee if negligence occurs within the scope of the employee's work, according to Cornell University's Legal Information Institute. A 2002 article in the Southern Medical Journal reveals that a health care provider may be held negligent, rather than a doctor, in some circumstances.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:
  • Q:

    What is a court disposition?

    A:

    A court disposition is the court's final ruling on a case or issue in legal proceedings. A court disposition is also needed when property is transferred by a deed or will to another's care or possession.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:
  • Q:

    What is a case management conference for a divorce?

    A:

    A case management conference is a meeting between both parties and their legal representatives during which they discuss how to proceed with the case, according to the Judicial Branch of California. Case management conferences are common during civil suits, which includes divorce, and take place between 120 and 180 days after the initial filing. In some cases, the court may waive the case management conference if paperwork is filed correctly.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:

Explore