Q:

What are the pros and cons of life support?

A:

Quick Answer

According to the Advanced Cardiac Life Support Training Center, two of the largest arguments for life support are that it assists in sustaining life for an indefinite period of time and that it goes against many people's moral codes to allow someone to die. Two arguments against the utilization of life support are that the apparatus drains energy resources and that it is unethical to prolong life without consent.

 Know More
What are the pros and cons of life support?
Credit:Martin BarraudOJO ImagesGetty Images

Full Answer

The National Center for Biotechnology Information offers additional arguments for and against the use of life support. Arguments for life support include that it is required regardless of prognosis and that life support can be requested by patients or their personal representatives without any justification necessary. This means that a patient can request to be put on life support even if doctors do not believe that recovery is possible.

The responding arguments against life support note that while life support does sustain life, it does not heal or guarantee an improved quality of life. Additionally, if a personal representative is making the decision for the patient, the decision to sustain life on life support can be made without regard for quality of life. A Frontline report details how many people believe it goes against the ethical code of physicians to allow someone without medical training to make the decision to keep another person on life support.

Learn more about Side Effects

Related Questions

  • Q:

    What are the pros and cons of recess in schools?

    A:

    According to Public School Review, the pros of recess include giving children time to socialize with their friends outside of the classroom, to get exercise and to have a break from their school work. The cons include taking time away from teachers who need more classroom time and being a liability for schools in general.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:
  • Q:

    What are pros and cons of monarchy?

    A:

    According to Occupy Theory, monarchies are less corrupt than democratic governments but are disadvantageous because the masses do not have the power to remove a king or queen from leadership. The most common example of a monarchy is the British government in which the Queen of England acts as the Head of State.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:
  • Q:

    What are the pros and cons of absolute monarchy?

    A:

    Absolute monarchy is an archaic form of rule that has many pros and cons. In an absolute monarchy, the king or queen has total power. The government, if one exists, has no real influence and merely advises the monarch and implements and enforces the monarch's decrees.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:
  • Q:

    What are some pros and cons of volcanoes?

    A:

    Although volcanoes are commonly known for their destruction, they also play some useful roles. On the negative side, volcanoes destroy houses and cities, displace populations, disrupt business, generate tsunamis and destroy habitats and crops. On the positive side, volcanoes create new islands and land, generate tourism attraction points, create beautiful landscapes and scenery and provide habitats to pioneer species, notes Volcano World.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:

Explore