Q:

What does "54 40 or Fight" mean?

A:

Quick Answer

The phrase "54 40 or Fight" was a slogan created by Democratic nominee James K. Polk in an attempt to rally the public in support of removing control of portions of the United States, including Texas, California and Oregon, from the British. Geographically, the 54 40 line refers to the northern borderline of Oregon, which then formed the northernmost limit of the territory the U.S. sought to acquire from Britain. The idea behind acquiring additional land from British control derived from the concept of manifest destiny, which played a crucial role in shaping the domestic policies of the U.S.

Know More
What does "54 40 or Fight" mean?
Credit: Universal History Archive Universal Images Group Getty Images

Full Answer

At the time Polk ran as candidate for U.S. president, the Oregon Territory was one of two land areas with disputed ownership. In addition to the Oregon Territory, which included the modern states of Oregon, Idaho, Washington, Alaska and parts of the western Canadian coast, the U.S. and Great Britain claimed rightful ownership to the southwestern part of the U.S. that shared a border with Mexico. In the Treaty of 1818, the U.S. and Britain agreed to a joint ownership of the disputed regions but, in 1846, the two nations divided the Oregon Territory at the 49th parallel. Each nation claimed ownership of half.

Learn more about US History
Sources:

Related Questions

  • Q:

    What was the purpose of the National Industrial Recovery Act?

    A:

    The National Industrial Recovery Act allowed the president of the United States at the time, Franklin D. Roosevelt, to regulate industry in an attempt to alleviate the financial effects of the Great Depression and stimulate economic growth. Its secondary purpose was the establishment of the U.S. Public Works Administration.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:
  • Q:

    Why did General Robert E. Lee invade the North during the Civil War?

    A:

    General Robert E. Lee, the Confederate commander of the Army of Northern Virginia, invaded Union territory in an attempt to persuade the United States into a negotiated peace after a hoped-for decisive and damaging attack on Northern soil. It was also believed that a notable Southern victory in Union territory might have resulted in financial support and recognition of the Confederate cause from England or France. General Lee's first invasion of the North, which took place in Maryland during September of 1862, was repulsed by Union forces at the Battle of Antietam, but it was followed by a second invasion by Lee into Pennsylvania during the months of June and July in 1863.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:
  • Q:

    Why was the Texas annexation so controversial?

    A:

    The Texas annexation was so controversial because adding Texas to the United States would inflame sectional tensions between the abolitionist North and the slave-holding South. The Whigs were generally opposed to expansion that included slavery, while the Democrats supported such growth.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:
  • Q:

    What major historical events happened in Texas, other than the Alamo?

    A:

    Major historical events in Texas include the Texas Declaration of Independence, the annexation of Texas to the United States, the termination of slavery, the ratification of the Constitution, and oil drilling. The foundation for all these events was Alvar Nunez Cabeza de Vaca's first exploration of Texas in 1528.

    Full Answer >
    Filed Under:

Explore