Barron V Baltimore Case?


Barron v. Baltimore is a United States Supreme Court case in which a precedent was established regarding whether the United States Bill of Rights can be applied to state governments. In the case, John Barron sued the state of Baltimore for diverting the flow of streams during street construction and, in effect, damaging business at the wharf he co-owned. He was originally awarded $4,500, but the ruling was reversed by the appellate court.
Q&A Related to "Barron V Baltimore Case?"
The case found the Bill of Rights, apply to and restrain the federal
It upheld the concept of "dual citizenship," thereby declaring that the Bill of Rights only applied to the national government.
It was a case where the US Supreme Court held that the Bill of Rights applied only to the actions of the federal government, not the individual state governments. After the Civil
John Barron owned a profitable wharf in the Baltimore harbor. He sued the mayor of Baltimore for damages claiming city development/expansion ruined his harbor.
Explore this Topic
Barron v. Baltimore was overturned because the Bill of Rights could not be applied to state governments. The case involved dredging that affected Mr. Barrons's ...
Barron v. Mayor of Baltimore, 32 U.S. (7 Pet.) 243 (1833) ...
Barron vs Baltimore is a landmark case. It was decided by the US Supreme Court in 1833. It is the basis of the doctrine that the Bill of Rights is only a restriction ...
About -  Privacy -  AskEraser  -  Careers -  Ask Blog -  Mobile -  Help -  Feedback © 2014