Which Was an Argument Used to Dispute the Theory of Plate Tectonics?

Answer

The theory of plate tectonics was disputed by the impossibility of Continents cutting through the floor of the ocean. In addition to that it was not an independent theory but was built on the continental drift theory that is the breaking away of a landmass into different plates due to external and internal forces. Plate tectonics is a geological theory that refers to the division of the lithosphere into various plates that cover the surface of the earth.
Q&A Related to "Which Was an Argument Used to Dispute the Theory..."
Continents cannot cut through the ocean floor.
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Which_was_an_argument_us...
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Which_was_an_i….
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=200912...
Homework is an assignment to be done
http://www.chacha.com/question/how-have-earthquake...
Do you want a serious answer? ok. plate tectonics shows that the pacific plate is moving north east up and across the north american plate. minor plate to the north is subducted beneath
http://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/How-it-Works/Questi...
Explore this Topic
The most accepted theory on the movement of drifting continents is Plate Tectonics. It is largely based upon the theory of Continental Drift. ...
Plate tectonics is a theory to describe movement of the platelike sections of the crust and upper mantle of the earth. This theory was developed from the older ...
About -  Privacy -  AskEraser  -  Careers -  Ask Blog -  Mobile -  Help -  Feedback © 2014 Ask.com