There are a number of questionable claims, but the best illustration of an explicit fallacy would be a "post hoc ergo propter hoc" fallacy (translated from Latin as "before this, therefore because of this"), which is oft...
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090823114...
The argument is not valid at all because, in the first place, it's not a real argument. You have only one premise presented (P) and immediately present it as a conclusion. It becomes a fallacy because there is no actual support for your con...
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070514063...
The Regress argument starts with the idea that some beliefs are justified by reference to others. "All agree that some of our beliefs are justified by their relation to other beliefs" For example, if I already believe that Socrate...
http://www.oppapers.com/essays/Explain-The-Regress-Argu...
Right/wrong is subjective....one size does not fit all You can't know everyone so your field of knowledge of people is very small Your mindset might be rigid, skewed and based on extreme bigotry/prejudice You may not know anyone who has sac...
http://www.answerbag.com/q_view/1876903?ref=W_Ask&u...
No it would not be. It would be common sense.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100129150...
I do not think that it is fallacious. There are however considerations regarding dividends that need addressing. First of all the real purpose of owning a stock should be the total expected return of the stock. Dividends make up a portion o...
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081104071...
We may just have to say it louder next time. The Arbourist December 27, 2009 at 11:25 AM
http://drudgeretort.wordpress.com/2009/12/23/was-jesus-...