If it possible to consider existence apart from time, out of time, or transending time, then the notion of existence preceeding anything is daft... Time is a perameter we give meaning to because it puts existence into some perspective, orde...
http://www.philosophyforum.com/philosophy-forums/existe...
In modern existentialist thought Jean-Paul Sartre made use of Aquinas's distinction between essence and existence but reversed them by insisting that existence precedes essence.
http://qanda.encyclopedia.com/question/insisted-existen...
I'm not quite sure what you are asking, but I'll try to give you my answer: Existence precedes essence in the sense that in order to be an essence there would have to be something to exist to "contain" that essence. I don't see th...
http://yedda.com/questions/arts_humanities_862268377143...
It means one acts in order to become; or, we are what we do, we become the things we have done, we're the sum of our actions.
http://www.chacha.com/question/what-does-sartre-meanin-...
Here's my interpretation: Before we can consider any other aspects of a human life, we have to deal with the first and most basic fact: it's existence. This is in contrast to previous systems which were more interested in qualities associat...
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20071214060...
No, the reverse: Existence precedes essence. Philosophical persuasion: Existential Atheist
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080420153...
No, my dear gentle... It is YOU (& Sarte) who are wrong. Your supposed explanation is self-contradictory. It always amused me how obvious this simple fact is about Sarte's ridiculous conclusion to the obvious tautology "Existence...
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20081227181...