If you think a bit, then you realize that that can only be done indirectly. The climate on Earth (during the Jurassic and other periods) is due to the luminosity of the Sun, but convoluted by other effects, such as distribution of landmas...
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20091231103...
I would say no. As I've noted before, the geological record indicates that climates have grown warmer and colder on Earth in cycles that correlate only very roughly to long-scale changes in solar luminosity (there have been repeated ice a...
http://raycomfortfood.blogspot.com/2008/09/ark-dimentio...
・ How will scientists be able to explain a controlled fusion reaction occurring within the 12 th planet, ... ・ How will scientists explain a large terrestrial object, which planetary theories states should be a gas ... ・ How will scientists...
http://www.grantchronicles.com/shortsummary24a.htm
No, because the sun produces light. To be luminous, the sun would have to reflect light.
http://www.blurtit.com/q9617402.html
A solar luminosity is equal to the current luminosity of the Sun, which is 3.839 × 10 26 W, or 3.839 × 10 33 erg/s. So dividing one solar luminosity with the Suns luminosity gives 1. Also it is a lot easier talking about a luminosity of 1 r...
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Why_is_the_suns_luminosity_1
Compared with the Sun it is massive, about 45 times as large so the energy it is putting out dwarfs anything the Sun is presently putting out.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090208143...
Assuming main sequence stars - the temperature would be about 15,000 Kelvin.
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_would_be_the_approximate...