A little-remarked feature of pending legislation on domestic surveillance has provoked alarm among university and public librarians who say it could allow federal intelligence-gathering on library patrons without sufficient court oversight....
http://getinvolved.pointofview316.com/2007/11/do-propos...
I don't know. Didn't he campaign against it. I'm sure that President Pelosi will never allow it.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090920061...
They are different. The Sedition Act limited speech. Current laws just monitor it. I don't really see it as a replication. The Alien Enemies Act is still in effect, and it is the one part that I think should remain in effect. It is differen...
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080701160...
In August, on the strength of Republican votes, Congress closed the terrorist loophole in our surveillance laws and entrusted intelligence officials – not government lawyers – with protecting our troops or emboldening our national security....
http://republicanleader.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.a...
Can the Beltway still be living in a September 10 world? I’ve kept you updated on the latest FISA shenanigans by Democrats who would rather let the nation’s surveillance laws lapse to benefit their presidential candidates than agree to a p...
http://michellemalkin.com/category/fisa/
That's left up to the localities. With Washington, D.C., they have certain restrictions on when the city can put up cameras and what kind of signage there must be.
http://gcn.com/articles/2007/06/02/does-facial-recognit...
We, as Americans, should be outraged that our "President" continues to disregard our privacy. I find it insulting that our government can shoot first and ask questions later. The fact that Alberto Gonzales still has a job should s...
http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/situation.room/blog/arc...