Deforestation is a complex problem that requires many different approaches to solve. Approaching the problem in the corporate world, with consumers and through governments may make a difference, according to Greenpeace.
Corporations can help reduce deforestation by implementing zero-deforestation policies for their suppliers. This encourages their suppliers to produce agricultural products, timber and paper fiber with minimal impact on the environment, according to Greenpeace. They can also implement policies concerning their use of paper to maximize the use of recycled materials in the paper products that they consume.
Greenpeace explains that consumers can help curb deforestation by pressuring companies with spotty environmental records. Buying recycled wood products, and buying brands that have zero-deforestation policies, may encourage other companies to do the same. Imploring others to follow the same practices can increase the number of consumers who buy products from environmentally-responsible companies.
Governments must also play a role. In the United States, legislation, such as the Lacey Act, the Wilderness Act, and the Roadless Rule, protects the country's forests. The international community can help reduce greenhouse gas emissions caused by deforestation in tropical forests by using the Forests for Climate proposal. The proposal would provide nations with funding for capacity-building efforts in exchange for commitments to protect their forests, as explained by Greenpeace.Learn More
Though deforestation is beneficial as a means to an end in terms of providing natural resources and cleared land for human habitation and development, its negative impacts can be dramatic in the natural world. These include depriving animals of their natural habitats, along with disrupting the natural process of oxygen production and the water cycle. Other negative impacts of deforestation include soil erosion and even climate change.Full Answer >
Mother Nature Network holds that individuals and responsible companies are striving to stop deforestation by going paperless, planting trees, recycling, purchasing recycled products and looking for the Forest Stewardship Council certification on the lumber products they buy. However, deforestation is also being fought on a much grander scale by special interest groups, such as Greenpeace.Full Answer >
Removing tracts of rainforest lands, a process called deforestation, can accelerate climate change, cause soil erosion, disrupt crop growth, increase the risk of flooding and even have economic consequences. Deforestation has many causes, including farming and logging. Regardless of the motive for clearing forests, the consequences of cutting down large parcels of trees has the same environmental impact.Full Answer >
Deforestation can generate income for farmers, land developers and national economies, but deforestation can have a negative impact on local and global ecologies and ecosystems. The population in most countries is increasing, which puts pressure on local economies to produce more food or clear more land for urban development priorities such as housing and commerce. Cutting down forests not only generates income from the sale of timber, but also clears land for use in development. On the other hand, forests are vital parts of local and global ecosystems. Cutting down forests, especially jungles and rain forests, often threatens species of wildlife and ultimately contributes to dangerous trends such as global warming.Full Answer >