Web Results

Insular Cases

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insular_Cases

The Insular Cases are a series of opinions by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1901, about the status ... United States, 182 U.S. 222 (1901); Armstrong v. ... Decided: May 27, 1901; Dooley v. .... Consejo ...

Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Center, Inc. : SCOTUSblog

www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/armstrong-v-exceptional-child-center-inc/

Armstrong v. Exceptional Child ... Aug 27 2014, Brief of respondents Exceptional Child Center, Inc., et al. in opposition filed. Sep 9 2014 ... Nov 17 2014, Brief of petitioners Richard Armstrong, et al. filed. ... May 4 2015, JUDGMENT ISSUED.

15-1191 - United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

www.ca4.uscourts.gov/Opinions/Published/151191.P.pdf

Oct 28, 2015 ... for the Middle District of North Carolina on May 20, 2013. The district court ... entitled to qualified immunity.” Estate of Ronald H. Armstrong v. Village of ...... Ashcroft v. al-Kidd, 563 U.S. 731, 742 (2011)), courts must “not .

ARMSTRONG v. EXCEPTIONAL CHILD CENTER, INC. | US Law ...

www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/14-15

RICHARD ARMSTRONG, et al., PETITIONERS v. .... Thus, a court may not convict a criminal defendant of violating a state law that federal law prohibits. See , e.g. ...

ARMSTRONG v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-8th-circuit/1660108.html

Mar 13, 2014 ... Case opinion for US 8th Circuit ARMSTRONG v. ... Jeremy M. Klausner, argued, Hackensack, NJ, for appellants Armstrong et al. Aalok Sharma ...

SUPREME COURT RULES IN CRACK COCAINE CASE

www.civilrights.org/monitor/vol8_no5_6/art7.html

On May 13, 1996, the Supreme Court ruled 8-1 in United States v. Armstrong et.al . (No. 95-157) that Armstrong and other defendants had no grounds to obtain ...

Armstrong v. Armstrong :: :: Supreme Court of California Decisions ...

law.justia.com/cases/california/supreme-court/3d/15/942.html

MARC B. ARMSTRONG, a Minor, etc., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. HENRY ... In this appeal we consider whether a court may take cognizance of a child's ...

Explaining Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Center: The Supreme ...

kff.org/medicaid/issue-brief/explaining-armstrong-v-exceptional-child-center-the-supreme-court-considers-private-enforcement-of-the-medicaid-act/

Jan 14, 2015 ... This issue — whether the parties may maintain a cause of action ... the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Armstrong v.

Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Center - Amicus Briefs

www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publications/supreme_court_preview/BriefsV4/14-15_pet_amicus_texas.pdf

RICHARD ARMSTRONG AND LISA HETTINGER,. PETITIONERS v. ... Attorney General of Alabama ..... that state officials may be sued under section 1983 only.

Armstrong v. John R. Jurgensen Co. - Supreme Court

www.supremecourt.ohio.gov/rod/docs/pdf/0/2013/2013-ohio-2237.pdf

Jun 4, 2013 ... JOHN R. JURGENSEN COMPANY ET AL.,. APPELLEES. [Cite as Armstrong v. John R. Jurgensen Co., 136 Ohio St.3d 58,. 2013-Ohio-2237.].

More Info

Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Center, Inc. - Supreme Court

www.supremecourt.gov

Mar 31, 2015 ... RICHARD ARMSTRONG, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. EXCEPTIONAL .... who may enforce federal laws in court, and in what cir- cumstances they ...

United States v. Armstrong et al., 517 U.S. 456 687 (1996).

www.law.cornell.edu

UNITED STATES, PETITIONER v. CHRISTOPHER LEE ARMSTRONG et al. on writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the ninth circuit. [ May 13  ...

Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Center, Inc. | Oyez

www.oyez.org

Armstrong v. ... Richard Armstrong, et al. ... part and concurring in the judgment, Justice Stephen G. Breyer wrote that federal courts may not grant injunctive relief  ...