Web Results

Selective prosecution - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selective_prosecution

In jurisprudence, selective prosecution is a procedural defense in which a defendant argues ... In the US, this defense is based upon the 14th Amendment, which stipulates, "nor ... McCleskey v....

United States v. Armstrong | Oyez

www.oyez.org/cases/1995/95-157

Feb 26, 1996 ... Christopher Lee Armstrong and others were indicted on federal charges of " conspiring to possess with intent to distribute more than 50 grams ...

United States v. Armstrong | Casebriefs

www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/criminal-procedure/criminal-procedure-keyed-to-weinreb/prosecution/united-states-v-armstrong-4/

View this case and other resources at: Citation. 517 U.S. 456, 116 S. Ct. 1480, 134 L. Ed. 2d 687, 1996 U.S. Brief Fact Summary. Armstrong was.

Armstrong v. United States (full text) :: 364 U.S. 40 (1960) :: Justia ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/364/40/case.html

U.S. Supreme Court. Armstrong v. United States, 364 U.S. 40 (1960). Armstrong v . United States. No. 270. Argued March 28, 1960. Decided June 27, 1960.

United States v. Armstrong

www.invispress.com/law/justice/armstrong.html

United States v. Armstrong 517 U.S. 456, 116 S. Ct. 1480, 134 L. Ed.2d 687 ( 1996). The police sent some informants to buy drugs from Armstrong and his ...

United States v. Armstrong Case Brief - Quimbee

www.quimbee.com/cases/united-states-v-armstrong

A summary and case brief of United States v. Armstrong, including the facts, issue , rule of law, holding and reasoning, key terms, and concurrences and dissents.

ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES | FindLaw

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/364/40.html

Case opinion for US Supreme Court ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

UNITED STATES v. ARMSTRONG | FindLaw

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/517/456.html

Case opinion for US Supreme Court UNITED STATES v. ARMSTRONG. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.

United States v. Armstrong et al., 517 U.S. 456 687 (1996).

www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/95-157.ZO.html

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the  ...

United States v.Armstrong: Permissible ... - Why Mercer Law?

www2.law.mercer.edu/lawreview/getfile.cfm?file=48312.pdf

UNITED STATES V. ARMSTRONG. 1311 supervisors on equal protection bounds, alleging that all two hundred. Chinese applications for laundry licenses were ...