Web Results

CAFC Reverses Award of 285 Fees: Biax Corp. v. Nvidia Corp ...

patentlyo.com/hricik/2015/02/reverses-award-nvidia.html

Feb 24, 2015 ... In a non-prec opinion in Biax Corp. v. Nvidia Corp., the panel (Dyk-auth; Lourie; Taranto) reversed the district court's award of section 285 fees ...

Biax Corp. v. Nvidia Corp. - CAFCBlog.com

www.cafcblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Biax-Corp.-v.-Nvidia-Corp.-13-1649.pdf

Feb 24, 2015 ... BIAX CORPORATION,. Plaintiff-Appellant v. NVIDIA CORPORATION,. Defendant -Cross Appellant. SONY COMPUTER ENTERTAINMENT ...

Biax Corp. v. Nvidia Corp., No. 13-1649 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 24, 2015)

www.ipbrief.net/2015/04/15/biax-corp-v-nvidia-corp-no-13-1649-fed-cir-feb-24-2015/

Apr 15, 2015 ... [Nonprecedential] On February, 24, 2015, in its nonprecedential opinion, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal ...

Nvidia, Sony Awarded $2M In Attys' Fees In Patent Suit - Law360

www.law360.com/articles/464637/nvidia-sony-awarded-2m-in-attys-fees-in-patent-suit

Aug 13, 2013 ... Sony is represented by Kirkland & Ellis LLP and Ballard Spahr LLP, among others. The case is BIAX Corp. v. Nvidia Corp. et al., case number ...

Fed. Circ. Junks $2M Nvidia, Sony Fee Award Despite Octane ...

www.law360.com/articles/624571/fed-circ-junks-2m-nvidia-sony-fee-award-despite-octane

Feb 24, 2015 ... ... an award of $2 million in attorneys' fees to Nvidia Corp. and Sony Corp., saying the lower court wrongly held that a failed patent suit by Biax Corp. was baseless, despite the U.S. Supreme Court's ... The case is Biax Corp. v.

An 'Exceptional Case' One Year After Octane: Part 2 - Law360

www.law360.com/articles/670191/an-exceptional-case-one-year-after-octane-part-2

Jul 1, 2015 ... An opposite conclusion was reached by the Federal Circuit in Biax Corp. v. Nvidia Corp.[3] At the district court, Biax lost a claim construction ...

Bad Faith Patent Litigation Is Bad News For Plaintiffs | Bracewell

www.bracewelllaw.com/news-publications/updates/bad-faith-patent-litigation-bad-news-plaintiffs

Aug 14, 2013 ... In BIAX Corp. v. NVIDIA, the District of Colorado this week denied a motion for reconsideration of over $2 million dollars in attorney's fees and ...

SmartMetric, Inc. v. Mastercard International Inc.

www.ipo.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/smartmetric.pdf

Mar 25, 2015 ... Title: SmartMetric, Inc. -v- MasterCard International, Inc., et al. ... attorneys' fees, Octane Fitness, LLC v. .... Biax Corp. v. Nvidia Corp., Nos.

IP Newsflash - February 27, 2015 - Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld ...

www.akingump.com/images/content/3/5/v2/35214/IP-Newsflash-February-27-2015.pdf

Feb 27, 2015 ... Federal Circuit Throws Out $2 Million Award to Nvidia and Sony ... Circuit has overturned a sanctions ruling against Biax Corp., a patent holding company ... Last year, the Supreme Court issued two cases—Octane Fitness v.

Precedential Patent Cases From the Federal Circuit in the Past Week

www.schwabe.com/showarticle.aspx?Show=13715

Mar 2, 2015 ... Biax – The Circuit reverses a grant of attorneys' fees for continuing to litigate, in bad faith, ... Gilead Sciences, Inc. v. .... Nvidia Corp., Fed Cir.

Popular Q&A
Q: What is the website for Nvidia Corporation?
A: http://www.nvidia.com Read More »
Source: www.answers.com
Q: Who started NVIDIA Corporation?
A: 1993: NVIDIA is founded by Jen-Hsun Huang, Chris Malachowsky, and Curtis Priem. Read More »
Source: www.chacha.com
Q: What is the ticker symbol for NVIDIA Corporation.
A: Ticker Symbol NVDA The ticker symbol for NVIDIA Corporation is NVDA and it is traded on the Nasdaq. Read More »
Source: www.answers.com
Q: What does n.v. stand for in dutch corporations?
A: 'N.V.' stands for 'Naamloze Vennootschap'. Read More »
Source: wiki.answers.com
Q: What is the significance of Dodge v. Ford Motor Company in terms ...
A: Quoting Wikipedia (. Dodge v. Ford Motor Company.): Dodge v. Ford Motor Company. [1]. is a case in which the. Michigan Supreme Court. held that. Henry Ford. owe... Read More »
Source: www.quora.com