CFTC website includes alerts, news, and public information.
Apr 17, 2013 ... The case is Bloomberg LP v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, 13-cv-
00523, U.S. District Court, District of Columbia (Washington).
Commodity Futures Trading Commission company research & investing ... United
States. Phone: ... Moreover, the Order states that because the EFPs were not
done in ... Bloomberg L.P., United States ... M · N · O · P · Q · R · S · T · U · V · W · X
Trading Commission (CFTC), analysis of the Commodity Exchange Act .... Margin
requirements: Bloomberg L.P. v CFTC, 2013 U.S. Dist. ... United States v.
U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION v. ... Securities and
Exchange Commission v. Norstra ... United States of America v Raymond Lambis
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Previous. U.S. Commodity ...
Bloomberg, L.P. v. CFTC, No. 13-00523 ... -United States v. Zacarias Moussaoui,
www.leagle.com/decision/In Adv FDCO 150319-000235/U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COM'N v. WILSON
Plaintiff, the United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the "CFTC"),
... In the United States, futures contracts must be negotiated and cleared on a ......
and Derivatives Association, Inc., Thompson Reuters, and Bloomberg LP.
Jun 30, 2010 ... A Model of Regulation through Substitution—Absolute vs. Relative Costs of ....
CFTC Chairman Gary Gensler, CFTC Roundtable on Futurization,. 1/31/13.
Recently .... 5 Complaint, Bloomberg L.P. vs. U.S. Commodity .... United States
were placed under the jurisdiction of the agriculture committees of the ...
www.bloombergsdr.com/assets/img/BSDR LLC - Disclosure Document (v.04.01.2015).pdf
of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “CEA”)) that is registered with the United
States. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”). The activities of ...
www.robinskaplan.com/~/media/pdfs/beyond supply demand manipulation in the commodities markets.pdf?la=en
Originally published by Bloomberg Finance L.P. in the Vol. 5, No. ... forced by the
CFTC or a private party.1 The CEA does ... For example, in United States v.