Web Results

Chapman v. Procter & Gamble Distributing, LLC : SCOTUSblog

www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/chapman-v-procter-gamble-distributing-llc/

May 18, 2015 ... Issue: Whether Federal Rule of Evidence 702, as interpreted by Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals and its progeny, permits a district ...

In re: DRY MAX PAMPERS LITIGATION - Sixth Circuit

www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/13a0203p-06.pdf

Aug 2, 2013 ... PROCTER & GAMBLE DISTRIBUTING LLC, ... directors of Procter & Gamble, are excluded from the class definition. P&G agreed to .... defendant is concerned only with its total liability[,]” Strong v. ... Midland Funding LLC,.

United States v. Procter & Gamble Co. :: 356 U.S. 677 (1958 ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/356/677/

U.S. Supreme Court. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co., 356 U.S. 677 (1958). United States v. Procter & Gamble Co. No. 51. Argued April 28, 1958. Decided ...

More Info

Marianne Chapman, et al. v. The Procter & Gamble Distributing, LLC ...

media.ca11.uscourts.gov

Sep 11, 2014 ... Gamble Distributing, LLC and The Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Company ... Chapmans' expert testimony under Daubert v. Merrell Dow ...

P&G

us.pg.com

Multinational manufacturer of product ranges including family, personal and household care products.

MORRISSEY v. PROCTER & GAMBLE CO., 379 F.2d 675 (1st Cir ...

www.law.cornell.edu

Plaintiff alleges that the defendant, Procter & Gamble Company, infringed, ... Pinci v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp., S.D. N.Y., 1951, 95 F.Supp. 884 ...