intellirights.com/articles/ClearValue Inc. v. Pearl River Polymers Inc. (Fed. Cir. Feb. 17 2012).pdf
Feb 17, 2012 ... ClearValue) accused Pearl River Polymers, Inc., et al. (collectively, Pearl River)
of indirectly infringing U.S. patent no. 6,120,690 ('690 patent).
Dec 9, 2013 ... CLEARVALUE, INC. v. PEARL RIVER POLYMERS, INC. 2. HOWARD L. CLOSE,
Wright & Close, L.L.P., of Hou- ston, Texas, for ...
Mar 14, 2012 ... ClearValue Inc. v. Pearl River Polymers Inc. The Court of Appeals for the Federal
Circuit recently ruled (ClearValue Inc. v. Pearl River Polymers ...
Mar 30, 2012 ... ClearValue Inc. v. Pearl River Polymers Inc., Case No. 11-1078 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 17
, 2012)(Moore, J.). The Federal Circuit reversed a jury verdict ...
Feb 17, 2012 ... Now, in ClearValue, Inc. v Pearl River Polymers, Inc., the Federal Circuit has
found a sub-range anticipated by a prior art range based on a lack ...
Atofina v. Great Lakes Chem. Corp. was the first of four Federal Circuit cases
... Pearl River Polymers, Inc. clarified the Federal Circuit's Atofina decision.
The sole claim at issue in ClearValue recited, in relevant part, “[a] process for ...
Dec 23, 2015 ... Atofina v. Great Lakes Chemical. Corp., 441 F.3d 991 (Fed Cir. 2006);
ClearValue, Inc. v. Pearl River Polymers,. Inc. 668 F.3d 1340, 1345 (Fed.
Compare ClearValue Inc. v. Pearl River Polymers Inc., 668 F.3d 1340, 101
USPQ2d 1773 (Fed. Cir. 2012) with Atofina v. Great Lakes Chem. Corp, 441 F.3d
www.willkie.com/~/media/Files/Publications/2012/10/Federal Circuit Review - Anticipation/Files/Federal Circuit Review Anticipationpdf/FileAttachment/Federal Circuit Review - Anticipation.pdf
the disclosure of a broad numerical range may anticipate a narrower range, as
explained in. ClearValue, Inc. v. Pearl River Polymers, Inc., 668 F.3d 1340 (Fed.
anticipation to cover a range within a range absent a showing of criticality. In
ClearValue, Inc. v. Pearl River Polymers,. Inc., 668 F.3d 1340, 101 U.S.P.Q.2d