Feb 17, 2012 ... ClearValue) accused Pearl River Polymers, Inc., et al. (collectively, Pearl River)
of indirectly infringing U.S. patent no. 6,120,690 ('690 patent).
Mar 12, 2012 ... The February 17 decision in ClearValue Inc. v. Pearl River Polymers Inc., __ F.3d
__ (Fed. Cir. 2012), is the latest effort of the U.S. Court of ...
Feb 22, 2012 ... In the recently issued case of ClearValue, Inc. v. Pearl River Polymers, Inc.,
Judge Moore, writing for the Federal Circuit panel, distinguished the ...
Feb 17, 2012 ... Now, in ClearValue, Inc. v Pearl River Polymers, Inc., the Federal Circuit has
found a sub-range anticipated by a prior art range based on a lack ...
Atofina v. Great Lakes Chem. Corp. was the first of four Federal Circuit cases
... Pearl River Polymers, Inc. clarified the Federal Circuit's Atofina decision.
The sole claim at issue in ClearValue recited, in relevant part, “[a] process for ...
Mar 1, 2012 ... In ClearValue, Inc. v. Pearl River Polymers, Inc., the Federal Circuit found that a
jury verdict of validity was not supported by substantial ...
Brown v. 3M, 265 F.3d 1349, 1351, 60 USPQ2d 1375, 1376 (Fed. Cir. ..... Pearl
River Polymers Inc., 668 F.3d 1340, 101 USPQ2d 1773 (Fed. ... In ClearValue,
the claim at issue was directed to a process of clarifying water with alkalinity
www.willkie.com/~/media/Files/Publications/2012/10/Federal Circuit Review - Anticipation/Files/Federal Circuit Review Anticipationpdf/FileAttachment/Federal Circuit Review - Anticipation.pdf
the disclosure of a broad numerical range may anticipate a narrower range, as
explained in. ClearValue, Inc. v. Pearl River Polymers, Inc., 668 F.3d 1340 (Fed.
seconds to ten minutes"; [ii] "150 º F. to 300 º F." Schreiber Foods, Inc. v. Saputo
..... Clearvalue, Inc., et al. v. Pearl. River Polymers, Inc., et al., 2006 U.S. Dist.
Mar 15, 2012 ... The Federal Circuit recently addressed the patentability of ranges. In ClearValue,
Inc. v. Pearl River Polymers, Inc., decided on February 17, ...