Cox v. United States, 332 U.S. 442 (1947), was a case in which the Supreme
Court of the United States found that courts have only limited scope of review
U.S. Supreme Court. Cox v. United States, 332 U.S. 442 (1947). Cox v. United
States. No. 66. Argued October 14-15, 1947. Decided November 24, 1947 *.
View this case and other resources at: Citation. 696 N.E.2d 853, 1998 Ind. Brief
Fact Summary. Patrick E. Cox (Appellant) was convicted of murder.
Katzenbach, Acting Attorney General of the United States, Appellants, v.
Honorable W. Harold COX, United States District Judge of the United States
www.leagle.com/decision/1965642348F2d294_1580/UNITED STATES v. COX
Lawyer, Attorney, Counsel, Law Firm, & then UNITED STATES of America,
Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fritz M. COX, Defendant-Appellant. CECIL, Circuit Judge.
This is ...
A summary and case brief of United States v. Cox, including the facts, issue, rule
of law, holding and reasoning, key terms, and concurrences and dissents.
A summary and case brief of Cox v. New Hampshire, including the facts, issue,
rule ... Cox v. New Hampshire. United States Supreme Court 312 U.S. 569 (1941)
Definition of Cox v. Louisiana 1965 – Our online dictionary has Cox v. Louisiana
1965 information from Supreme Court Drama: Cases That Changed America ...
United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. D. Sherman and Maxine M. COX,
Appellants, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Appellee. No.
Paul COX, Petitioner-Appellee, v. David H. MILLER, Superintendent, Eastern
Correctional Facility, Respondent-Appellant. Docket No. 01-2515. United States ...