Web Results

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes - Wikipedia


Wal-Mart v. Dukes, 564 U.S. 338 (2011), was a United States Supreme Court case. The case was an appeal from the Ninth Circuit's decision in Dukes v.

Doe v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. - DigitalCommons@ILR


Jul 10, 2009 ... DOE III; JANE DOE IV, individually and on behalf of Wal-Mart workers in Dhaka, Bangladesh;. JANE DOE V; JANE DOE VI; JOHN. DOE III ...

9th Circ. Affirms Toss Of Wal-Mart Foreign Labor Case - Law360


Jul 14, 2009 ... Wal-Mart is represented by Morgan Lewis Bockius LLP. The case is Jane Doe I et al. v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., case number 08-55706, in the U.S. ...

Case Detail: Doe v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.


Doe v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Case Date: 5/5/2006. Project Name: Criminalization of Free Enterprise - Business Civil Liberties Program. On July 10, 2009, the U.S. ...

DOE I v. WAL-MART STORES, INC, 572 F.3d 677 (9th Cir. 2009 ...


DOE I v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. ... Here, Plaintiffs' allegations do not support the conclusion that Wal-Mart is ...

Doe, et al. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. | US Chamber Litigation Center


Employees of Wal-Mart's foreign suppliers sued in California federal court to require Wal-Mart to intervene to improve the labor conditions at the foreign ...

Download PDF - Littler


In Doe v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.,1 the United States Court of. Appeals for the ... In Doe, workers of manufacturing companies in China, Bangladesh, Indonesia,.

Doe v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. 08-55706 - US Ninth ... - FindLaw


Doe v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., No. 08-55706. By FindLaw Staff on July 10, 2009 3: 31 PM. In a breach of contract action by employees of foreign suppliers to a U.S.  ...

Doe v. Wal-Mart: Must Common Law be Reformed to Protect Workers?


Nov 7, 2009 ... In Doe v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., plaintiffs were employees of enterprises located around the world that make and sell goods to Wal-Mart.

Doe v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. - West Virginia Judiciary


No. 26012 -- Jane Doe v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., a corporation; B.C. Associates Limited Partnership, a limited partnership; and Robert Belcher; and Jane Doe v.