Web Results

Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. - Wikipedia, the free ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brushaber_v._Union_Pacific_Railroad_Co.

Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., 240 U.S. 1 (1916), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the validity of a tax  ...

240 US 1 - Justia US Supreme Court Center

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/240/1/case.html

Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co., 157 U. S. 429. In this case -- that of a ... As a stockholder of the Union Pacific Railroad Company, the appellant filed his bill ...

Significance of Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad, 240 U.S. 1 (1916)

famguardian.org/subjects/Taxes/CourtCases/BrushaberVUnionPacRR240US1.htm

Mar 14, 2010 ... Mr. Brushaber owned stock in the Union Pacific Railroad, a corporation chartered in the federal Territory of Utah before it became a State.

Union Pacific Railroad v. Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines - US Chamber ...

www.chamberlitigation.com/sites/default/files/cases/files/16161616/U.S. Chamber Amicus Letter -- Union Pacific Railroad v. Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines (California Supreme Court).pdf

Jan 16, 2015 ... For over 60 years, Union Pacific Railroad Company has granted subsurface easements ... (1995) 11 Cal.4th 85, 98; see also Erlich v. Menezes ...

More Info

240 US 1 - Justia US Supreme Court Center

supreme.justia.com

U.S. Supreme Court. Brushaber v. Union Pacific R. Co., 240 U.S. 1 (1916). Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Company. No. 140. Argued October 14, 15, 1915.

BRUSHABER v. UNION PACIFIC R. CO. | FindLaw

caselaw.findlaw.com

As a stockholder of the Union Pacific Railroad Company, the appellant filed his bill to enjoin the corporation from complying with the income tax provisions of the  ...

KS Recent Opinions - District of Kansas-US District Court

ecf.ksd.uscourts.gov

District Judge Sam A. Crow. 12/30/2014, Civil Case No. 14-4020. Bowers v. ...... Ehrlich v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. Doc No. 68 (memorandum and order) ...