Case Summary: 10-cv-204 This case began in 2010 when Sloan Valve Co. (
Sloan) filed a complaint against Zurn Industries (Zurn) alleging that Zurn had ...
www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/_assets/_news/Ellis Case Reassignment.pdf
V. State Farm Automobile Insurance Company et al. .... V. Sloan Valve Company
.... C 00053 Corus Bankshares Inc. V. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
C13-01328; United Desert Charities, et al. v. Sloan Valve Company, et al.,
Central District of California, Case No. ... State Farm Mutual Automobile
Insurance Company, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, .... Federal
Wexler Wallace served as Co-Lead Counsel in this multidistrict consumer
litigation ... recovery by insureds, in violation of the terms of their insurance
policies. ... Dimov v. Sloan Valve Company Together with co-counsel, Wexler
Wallace LLP filed ... Wexler Wallace is prosecuting a consumer class action in
California federal ...
Mar 26, 2014 ... SLOAN VALVE COMPANY,. ) ) Plaintiff,. ) ) Case No. 10-cv-00204 v. ... “The
admissibility of expert testimony is governed by Federal Rule of ...
Sep 25, 2012 ... The Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District affirmed the trial courts
denial of summary judgment to Federal Insurance Company ...
Hanover Insurance Company, Cross-defendant-appellee, 717 F.2d 385 (7th Cir.
... two principal manufacturers of flush valves for toilets, the other being the Sloan
Company. ... 1949); 11 Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure Sec.
Free Database of 2013 Northern District of Illinois U.S. Federal District Court
Case Law, Court Opinions & Decisions from ... Sweis v. Travelers Casualty
Insurance Company of America Date: December 30, 2013 ..... Sloan Valve
Jul 25, 2014 ... v. SLOAN VALVE COMPANY,. AMERICAN STANDARD BRANDS .... He has
served as class counsel and insurance coverage counsel for ...
Nov 18, 2013 ... Plaintiff Sloan Valve Company (“Sloan”) has moved to strike ... “The admissibility
of expert testimony is governed by Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and ... See also
Manpower, Inc. v. Ins. Co. of Penn., 732 F.3d 796, 806 (7th Cir.