Feb 24, 2015 ... The case is Oxbow Carbon & Minerals LLC et al. v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. et
al., case number 1:11-cv-01049, in the U.S. District Court for ...
Jan 8, 2015 ... The case is Oxbow Carbon & Minerals LLC et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. et
al, case number is 1:11-cv-01049, in the U.S. District Court for ...
Union Pacific Railroad Company appeals from a judgment holding it liable ... See
W. Page Keeton et al., Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts § 45 (5th ed. ... is
no suggestion that Mr. Wilson had returned from the repair site or had begun ...
Jun 30, 2015 ... Union Pacific Railroad Company et al., case number 4:15-cv-00191, in the. U.S.
District Court for the District of Arizona and Richard Bagdasarian Inc. v. SFPP LP
.... “We've got our cases on ice, but if that legislative fix doesn't ...
Co-Chair, Antitrust and Trade Regulation Group HSalzman@RobinsKaplan.com
... In re Automotive Parts Antitrust Class Action: Involving alleged price-fixing ...
Oxbow Carbon & Minerals LLC, et al. v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, et al.
Mar 13, 2012 ... v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD,. Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United
States .... Rivera v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 378 F.3d 502, 507 (5th. Cir. 2004). ......
fixed or replaced broken knuckles, which held the train cars together. ... 2007;
and 5 L. Sand et al., Modern Federal Jury Instructions–Civil ¶ 89.10, at.
Jun 23, 2014 ... Railroad Company, Union Pacific Corporation (collectively “Union Pacific”), ...
Debtor-ASARCO, Union Pacific, and Pepsi all operated at the site ..... fixing the
amount of the claim to be paid and determining the party that will be.
Apr 12, 2011 ... Union Pacific Railroad Company offers these comments in response to the ..... TX
R. Co. et al., 4 I.C.C.2d 409, 430-31 (1988); Union Pacific Corp., Union Pacific
R.R. & ... See Central Power & Light Co. v. ..... Union Pacific routes in search of
better service; a simultaneous traffic surge; and lengthy repair.
STATE OF TENNESSEE et al. v. UNION & PLANTERS' BANK et al. SAME v. ....
Feibelman v. Packard, 109 U. S. 421, 3 Sup. Ct. 289; Kansas Pac. R. Co. v. ... Ct.
1104; Pacific Railroad Removal Cases, 115 U. S. 1, 5 Sup. ... of cases are the
same as in the act of 1875 (except that the jurisdictional amount is fixed at $2,000
Dec 12, 2013 ... Union Pacific Railroad Company lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. United States
.... Cf., e.g., David Luhnow et al., supra, at A1 (“Authorities and journalists in the. 5
..... Kansas, 272 U.S. 465, 468 (1926), “is too firmly fixed in.