Web Results

Murphy v. IRS - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murphy_v._IRS

Marrita Murphy and Daniel J. Leveille, Appellants v. Internal Revenue Service and United States of America, Appellees is a controversial tax case in which the ...

Garcia - United States Tax Court

www.ustaxcourt.gov/InOpHistoric/GarciaDiv.TC.WPD.pdf

Mar 14, 2013 ... SERGIO GARCIA, PETITIONER v. ... INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT ... his U.S. source personal service income is exempt from tax-.

Golfer Sergio Garcia Comes Up Short In Tax Court, But Is The ...

www.forbes.com/sites/anthonynitti/2013/03/14/golfer-sergia-garcia-comes-up-short-in-tax-court-but-is-the-decision-a-victory-for-other-athletes/

Mar 14, 2013 ... Earlier today, the U.S Tax Court decided Garcia v. ... the contract was properly characterized as personal service income, ... The IRS argued that 100% of the on -course endorsement fees represented personal service income.

GARCIA v. FOULGER PRATT DEVELOPMENT INC | FindLaw

caselaw.findlaw.com/md-court-of-special-appeals/1239712.html

Dec 4, 2003 ... Case opinion for MD Court of Special Appeals GARCIA v. ... pursuant to [Internal Revenue Service] Code Section 708(b)(2)(B) and establish ...

Life Science Church v. Internal Revenue Service, 525 F. Supp. 399 ...

law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/525/399/1691950/

Life Science Church v. Internal Revenue Service, 525 F. Supp. 399 (N.D. Cal. 1981) case opinion from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of ...

Tax Court Considers Taxation of the Golfer Sergio Garcia

www.copetax.com/tax-court-considers-taxation-of-sergio-garcia

Nearly two years ago, in our July 2011 column, we discussed Goosen v. ... the portion of Garcia's remuneration attributable to his personal services and ... In 2010 the IRS issued Garcia a notice of deficiency for taxable years 2003 and 2004.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ...

ecf.insd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?12013cv1612-77

Aug 12, 2014 ... INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, et al.,. ) ) Defendants. ..... own employees with insurance coverage, as suggested by Garcia v. San Antonio.

Garcia v. San Antonio Transit Auth. (full text) :: 469 U.S. 528 (1985 ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/469/528/case.html

Garcia v. SAMTA, Civil Action No. SA 79 CA 458. The District Court has stayed that ... In that case, the Court ruled that commuter rail service provided by the ..... however, has remained to single out particular features of a State's internal ..... " the State cannot withdraw sources of revenue from the federal taxing power by ...

The International Athlete and Entertainer: A Summary of Important ...

www.floridabar.org/divcom/jn/jnjournal01.nsf/8c9f13012b96736985256aa900624829/60be08ea3736626685257e140065dc20!OpenDocument

Under the services component, the athlete is compensated for performing service days for the ... Commissioner, 136 T.C. 547 (2011), and Garcia v. ... In Garcia, the IRS further contended that the royalty income component was subject to the ...

2016-04-14 Garcia v Harris Complaint

object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/wp-content/uploads/garcia_filed_complaint.pdf

Apr 14, 2016 ... v. KAMALA D. HARRIS, in her official capacity as Attorney General of California,. Defendant. ... Thus, for instance, retired Internal ... Revenue Service agents and other federal agents are exempt simply by virtue of retiring in.

More Info

Sergio Garcia and Retief Goosen Tax Cases: Double Bogey for IRS ...

www.accountingweb.com

May 28, 2013 ... Take a look at two recent Tax Court cases – Garcia v. ... service income (subject to ordinary US income tax) – nor the IRS claim that 100 percent ...

GARCIA v. COMMISSIONER | 80 T.C. 491 (1983) | Leagle.com

www.leagle.com

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT. ... GARCIA v. ... Federal income tax return with the Internal Revenue Service Center, Fresno, Calif ., ...

THE IRS' DOUBLE-BOGEY: GOOSEN V. COMMISSIONER ...

lawweb2009.law.villanova.edu

For a discussion about Sergio Garcia's recent case before the Tax Court, see infra .... Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), in Revenue Ruling 68-443, has pro-.