Mississippi ex rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp., 571 U.S. ___ (2014), was a
United States Supreme Court case in which the Court determined whether a ...
Holding: Under the Class Action Fairness Act, because Mississippi is the only
named plaintiff, the suit does not qualify as a "mass actions" – that is, a civil action
Jan 14, 2014 ... MISSISSIPPI EX REL. HOOD, ATTORNEY GENERAL v. AU OPTRONICS CORP.
ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF ...
Nov 6, 2013 ... On March 25, 2011, the State of Mississippi sued a group of liquid crystal display
(LCD) manufacturers and claimed that they harmed ...
Au Optronics Corp. et al, case number 2:13-cv-01207, from Washington Western
Court. ... Jacob D.C. Humphreys, BADGLEY MULLINS TURNER PLLC.
In Motorola Mobility LLC v. AU Optronics Corp., No. 14-8003, 2014 WL 1243797 (
7th Cir. Mar. 28, 2014), a Seventh Circuit panel narrowly construed the Foreign ...
Apr 30, 2015 ... The Supreme Court's decision in Daimler AG v. ... State in which a corporation “
engages in a substantial, continuous, and systematic course of business. .....
Humphreys (Cayman) Ltd., 916 F.2d 1239 (7th Cir. ... Au Optronics · The Future of
Hydraulic Fracturing · Mutual Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. v.
(02/22/2011) Green Party of Connecticut v. .... (05/23/2007) Dynetech
Corporation and GlobalTec Solutions, LLP v. ..... Cup Company, Inc. (11/04/1994)
In re Ford Motor Co Bronco II Litigation; (10/21/1994) Humphrey v. ... AU
Apr 3, 2014 ... See, e.g., Great W. Sugar Co. v. ... See Valero Terrestrial Corp. v. Paige .... to
leave its order intact where the circumstances leading to mootness arose after
the decision but before the mandate); Humphreys v. .... AU Optronics.
Toyota Motor Corp. v. Choi · Wan ... Chase Investment Services Corp. v.
Baumann ... Genesis HealthCare Corporation v. Symczyk ... Hood v. AU