Web Results
Go To:: Google
Google Inc. is an American multinational software corporation, first incorporated as a privately held corporation in September, 1998, that designs and manages the Internet's top rated search engine?
Popular Links:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interval_Research_Corporation

Interval Research Corporation was founded in 1992 by Paul Allen and David Liddle. It was a ... Four of its patents, now owned by Allen's Interval Licensing LLC, are the subject of a patent infringement lawsuit ... The lawsuit also points out that Interval Research was credited by Google in 1998 as an "outside collaborator" and ...

www.leagle.com/decision/infco20140910128

Sep 10, 2014 ... INTERVAL LICENSING LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AOL, INC., Defendant- Appellee, and Apple, Inc., Defendant-Appellee, and Google, Inc., ...

caselaw.findlaw.com/us-federal-circuit/1677676.html

Sep 10, 2014 ... Case opinion for US Federal Circuit INTERVAL LICENSING LLC v. ... INC., Defendant–Appellee, Apple, Inc., Defendant–Appellee, Google, Inc., ...

www.cnbc.com/2015/10/05/us-supreme-court-rejects-paul-allens-interval-licensing-patent-appeal.html

Oct 5, 2015 ... ... to revive patent claims against AOL, Apple, Google, and Yahoo over pop-ups. ... The patents, held by Allen's Interval Licensing, relate to the pop-ups that computer and smartphone users regularly see. ... Allen financed, Interval Research Corp, which shut down in 2000. ... The case is Interval Licensing v.

patentlyo.com/patent/2014/09/interval-licensing-indefiniteness.html

Sep 15, 2014 ... Interval Licensing LLC v. AOL, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2014) Interval v AOL ... Interval sued AOL, Apple, Google, and Yahoo for infringement. In its claim ...

online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/intervallicensingcomplaint0827.pdf

Aug 27, 2010 ... Plaintiff Interval Licensing LLC, files this complaint for patent ... Defendants AOL, Inc., Apple, Inc., eBay, Inc., Facebook, Inc., Google Inc., Netflix, ...

www.patentspostgrant.com/the-value-of-ptab-claim-analysis-in-the-district-court

Sep 11, 2014 ... Yesterday, the CAFC leveraged the PTAB's 112 analysis on subjective claim terminology in Interval Licensing LLC v. AOL, Inc. (Fed. Cir.

www.patentdocs.org/2015/04/biosig-instruments-inc-v-nautilus-inc-fed-cir-2015.html

Apr 27, 2015 ... Plumtree Software, Inc., 417 F.3d 1342, 1347 (Fed. Cir. ... Nautilus decision was to the contrary, as the Court stated in Interval Licensing LLC v.

www.wileyrein.com/newsroom-articles-3275.html

Sep 10, 2014 ... “[A] patent does not satisfy the definiteness requirement of § 112 merely because 'a court can ascribe some meaning to a patent's claims.