Web Results

Jeffrey Wax v. Amazon Technologies, Inc. - Amazon Sellers' Lawyer

www.amazonsellerslawyer.com/wax-v-amazon/

Jeffrey Wax v. Amazon Technologies, Inc. is a patent infringement case between Plaintiff Jeffrey S. Wax, a patent attorney, and Amazon.

Amazon Spanked Again in TTAB Discovery Ruling - The TTABlog

thettablog.blogspot.com/2010/09/precedential-no-35-amazon-spanked-again.html

Sep 13, 2010 ... Amazon Technologies, Inc. v. Jeffrey S. Wax, 95 USPQ2d 1865 (TTAB 2010) [ precedential]. Discovery Sanction:In its November 4, 2009 ...

Precedential No. 52 (2009): TTAB Rules That ... - The TTABlog

thettablog.blogspot.com/2010/03/precedential-no-52-2009-ttab-rules-that.html

Mar 2, 2010 ... And so the Board granted Wax's motion to compel. Amazon Technologies, Inc. v. Jeffrey S. Wax, 93 USPQ2d 1702 (TTAB 2009). Amazon made ...

Precedential No. 8: You Can't Move for Summary ... - The TTABlog

thettablog.blogspot.com/2010/03/precedential-no-8-you-cant-move-for.html

Mar 5, 2010 ... And in Amazon Technologies, Inc. v. Jeffrey S. Wax, 93 USPQ2d 1702 (TTAB 2009), the Board held that an objection to discovery on the ...

2013 Trademark Law Decisions of the Federal Circuit - Digital ...

digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1924&context=aulr

Apr 30, 2014 ... In the first Federal Circuit trademark opinion of 2013, Wax v. Amazon Technologies, Inc.,11 the court affirmed the Trademark Trial ... Patent & Trademark Office, to Jeffrey S. Wax, Applicant (June 4, 2008), available at.

Intent to Lose? - Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman

www.pillsburylaw.com/siteFiles/Publications/AlertMay2014IPIntenttoLose_BeWaryofPitfallsWhenAssigningIntenttoUseTrademarkApplications.pdf

May 22, 2014 ... Last summer's TTAB decision in Central Garden & Pet Company v. ... Jeffrey S. Wax, Opposition No. 91187118 (TTAB August 31, 2010), Mr. Freeland and Mr. Wax jointly filed an ITU application for AMAZON ... In a latter opposition, Amazon Technologies argued that Freeland and Wax violated Section.

Be Wary of Pitfalls in Intent-to-Use Trademark Applications

www.pillsburylaw.com/publications/pitfalls-in-intent-to-use-trademark-applications

May 22, 2014 ... Authors: Carolyn S. Toto, Mark R. Kendrick, Bobby Ghajar ... Last summer's TTAB decision in Central Garden & Pet Company v. ... Jeffrey S. Wax, Opposition No. ... In a latter opposition, Amazon Technologies argued that Freeland and Wax violated Section 10(a) because they had no ongoing and existing ...

Price: $4.50
Buy Armor All 10346 Ultra Shine Wash and Wax - 64 fl. oz.: Cleaners - Amazon. com ... Armor All's Ultra Shine Wash & Wax was developed using the most advanced technologies available. ..... works. Published 1 month ago by jeffrey j martin.
Amazon.com  · More about this product »

ACR Cases and ACR-like cases - United States Patent and ...

www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/trademarks/process/appeal/ACR_Case_List_(10-23-12).doc

Oct 23, 2012 ... Amazon Technologies, Inc. v. Jeffrey S. Wax (91187118):. After parties' cross- motions for summary judgment were denied, and the Board noted ...

Amazon.com : Nad's Body Wax Strips, 24 Strips : Hair Removal Wax ...

www.amazon.com/Nads-Body-Wax-Strips-24/dp/B000NQ4JGM

A quick and easy way to remove unwanted hair; Made from natural beeswax, the wax strip uses an innovative contour weave paper technology, softer and more ...