Johnson v. United States was a United States Supreme Court case in which the
Court ruled the "residual clause" of the Armed Career Criminal Act was ...
Holding: Imposing an increased sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act's
residual clause violates due process. Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 8-1, ...
In 2010, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) began investigating Samuel
Johnson based on his involvement in an organization called the National Social
Nov 10, 2015 ... Last Term, in Johnson v. United States, <sup>4×</sup> 4. 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015). the
Supreme Court struck down ACCA's residual clause because it was ...
Jun 29, 2015 ... April 2016: SCOTUS rules in Welch v. United States that the decision in Johnson
v. United States limiting the reach of the Armed Career ...
Jul 6, 2015 ... In Johnson, the Court interpreted the so-called “residual clause” of the Armed
Career ... United States, 550 U.S. 192 (2007) and Sykes v. United ...
Johnson v. United States. No. 329. Argued December 18, 1947. Decided
February 2, 1948. 333 U.S. 10. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF
Aug 21, 2015 ... 1. Guidance regarding Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015) for
clients whose sentences would not be enhanced today based on a ...
Jan 5, 2016 ... Johnson v. United States held that the “residual clause” of the Armed Career
Criminal Act (ACCA) is unconstitutionally vague. Since Johnson ...
Facts and case summary for Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989). Flag
burning constitutes symbolic speech that is protected by the First Amendment.