Web Results

Whitfield v. United States - Wikipedia


Whitfield v. United States, 574 U.S. ___ (2015), was a United States Supreme Court that ... On September 26, 2008, Larry Whitfield and Quanterrious McCoy attempted to rob a ... Jump up ^ "UNITE...



Mar 20, 2003 ... Case opinion for US 9th Circuit UNITED STATES v. McCOY. Read the ... UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rhonda Anne ...

United States v. McCoy and McQueen - US Department of Justice


May 8, 2012 ... UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,. Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CLARENCE MCCOY ... jury convicted McCoy and McQueen on all counts, and the district ...

Final Opinion


Mar 2, 2016 ... No. 14-2741. CHRISTOPHER H. MCCOY,. Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,. Respondent-Appellee.

United States v. McCoy - Mike Shecket


United States v. McCoy · 323 F.3d 1114 (9th Cir. 2003). Facts: McCoy was charged with violation of a federal child pornography law and pleaded guilty ...

United States of America, Appellee, v. Joann Mccoy, Appellant, 316 ...


United States of America, Appellee, v. Joann Mccoy, Appellant, 316 F.3d 287 ( D.C. Cir. 2003) case opinion from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of ...

Chase Bank USA, N.A., v. McCoy (09-329) | LII Supreme Court ...


Dec 8, 2010 ... 8, 2010 Appealed from: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Mar. ... James McCoy alleges that Chase Bank (“Chase”) retroactively .... brief submitted by the United States of America to support its position.

US v. McCOY - Casetext


Sep 20, 2011 ... UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff v. LAMONTA R. McCOY, Defendant. Case No.: 5:11 CR 184. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, ...

Chase Bank USA v. McCoy - SCOTUSblog


Jan 24, 2011 ... Chase Bank USA v. McCoy ... Bankers Association in Support of Petitioner · Brief for the United States of America in Support of Petitioner ...

432 F2d 730 Moore v. United States | OpenJurist


v. UNITED STATES of America. No. 17931. United States Court of Appeals, ..... 22. See United States ex rel. McCoy v. Rundle, 419 F.2d 118, 119-120 (3 Cir.