Molina-Martinez v. United States, 578 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the United States Court of Appeals ...
Holding: Courts reviewing use of an incorrect Federal Sentencing Guidelines range cannot apply a categorical "additional evidence" rule requiring a showing ...
Apr 20, 2016 ... come of the proceeding would have been different, United States v. ... Molina- Martinez could not satisfy Rule 52(b)'s requirement that the.
Jan 12, 2016 ... Saul Molina-Martinez pleaded guilty to being in the United States illegally following deportation proceedings that stemmed from his felony ...
Where an error in the application of the United States Sentencing Guidelines results in the application of the wrong Guideline range to a criminal defendant, ...
Jan 12, 2016 ... On August 31, 2012, United States Customs and Border Protection agents arrested petitioner Saul Molina-Martinez (“Molina-Martinez”)—a ...
Apr 20, 2016 ... MOLINA-MARTINEZ v. UNITED STATES ( ) : Courts reviewing Guidelines errors cannot apply a categorical “additional evidence” rule in cases, ...
Apr 20, 2016 ... On appeal, Molina-Martinez argued for the first time that the range ... that was not intentionally relinquished or abandoned, United States v.
Nov 6, 2006 ... Case opinion for US 5th Circuit UNITED STATES v. MOLINA. Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.
Mar 24, 2017 ... On March 14, 2017, Plaintiffs, the Molina Healthcare companies, filed a ... for the Government, appeal pending); Moda Health Plan, Inc. v.