United States v. Martinez-Fuerte, 428 U.S. 543 (1976) was a decision of the
United States Supreme Court that allowed the United States Border Patrol to set
Holding: Courts reviewing use of an incorrect Federal Sentencing Guidelines
range cannot apply a categorical "additional evidence" rule requiring a showing ...
Apr 20, 2016 ... Molina-Martinez could not satisfy Rule 52(b)'s requirement that the error affect his
... Peugh v. United States, 569 U. S. ___, ___. Sentencing.
Jan 12, 2016 ... Saul Molina-Martinez pleaded guilty to being in the United States illegally
following deportation proceedings that stemmed from his felony ...
Case opinion for US Supreme Court UNITED STATES v. MARTINEZ-FUERTE.
Read the Court's full decision on FindLaw.
Case opinion for US 5th Circuit UNITED STATES v. MARTINEZ. Read the Court's
full decision on FindLaw.
Avelino Martinez v. USA, No. 14-5860 (6th Cir. 2015) case opinion from the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Sep 3, 2015 ... The Supreme Court vacated the opinion and remanded the case to us for
consideration in light of Elonis. See Martinez v. United States, 135 S.
Apr 20, 2016 ... MOLINA-MARTINEZ v. UNITED STATES ( ) : Courts reviewing Guidelines errors
cannot apply a categorical “additional evidence” rule in cases, ...
That's why a group of parents and students filed Martinez v. ... Despite the United
States Constitution's guarantee of equal protection and due process, the State ...