An Ohio federal judge on Tuesday ruled that Maxum Indemnity Co. doesn't have
to cover losses ... Law360, Los Angeles (February 3, 2015, 6:44 PM ET) -- An
Ohio federal judge on Tuesday ruled ... The case is Maxum Indemnity Co. v.
Drive West Insurance Services Inc./Mulberry Insurance Services Inc. et al., case
Nov 19, 2015 ... Maxum Indemnity Co. is liable to provide coverage under a professional ... by the
6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals In Cincinnati in Maxum Indemnity Co. v. Drive
West Insurance Services Inc./Mulberry Insurance Services Inc. et al.; ... A three
judge appeals court panel overturned that ruling in a 2-1 decision.
Docket Number: 3:2015cv00111. Gonzalez v. ... J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v.
Chucho's ... et al v. Brundage Management Company, Inc. Employee Benefit
Plan et al .... Maxum Indemnity Company v. ...... Blue Cross and Blue Shield of
Typically, coverage must be declined by three admitted insurers before ...
Currently, Maxum Indemnity Company is not an eligible non-admitted insurer in ...
Apr 1, 2013 ... Georgia is Southern General Insurance Co. v. .... indemnity language and a
dismissal with prejudice. ... 3 said “full and final settlement” even though the
parties agreed ..... Accor North America, Inc. et al. v. .... Maxum Indemn. Co. v.
Jimenez, 318 Ga. App. 669, 734 S.E.2d 499, decided November 20, 2012.