McCallum #159269 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al, No. 1:
2015cv00700 - Document 4 (W.D. Mich. 2015) case opinion from the Western
District of ...
v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et. al., Defendants. No. 96–CV
–71416–DT ... court, which is whether a court may stay a deposition based on a ...
Dec 17, 2014 ... MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. ... Service Employees
International Union, Local 526M, et al., Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. .... What we are
left with is this: Congress may abrogate the States' sovereign immunity ...
Mar 20, 2014 ... v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF. CORRECTIONS (MDOC), et al., ... may be sent
by the Attorney General to any State or district in the United ...
5 F. 3d 186 - Griffin v. ... v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.,
... in May 1987, the magistrate submitted a report and recommendation.
OVERTON, DIRECTOR, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al. v.
.... Under the MDOC's regulations, an inmate may receive visits only from ...
DEBRA SCOTT, ET AL., Defendants. ... On May 27, 2011, Plaintiff, a pro se
prisoner, brought the instant suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against ... Plaintiff is a
prisoner confined by the Michigan Department of Corrections (MDOC). .....
MAY 2007 ..... information case to $230,000 in Heistand v LaBarge, et al., for
alleged violation of constitutional rights .... Mallory-Bay, Donald v MDOC, et al.
Specifically, the PLRA maintained that no prisoner may sue the department of ....
See e.g.,Brief for Respondent Michigan Department of Corrections, et. al., at 8, ...
Jun 16, 2003 ... OVERTON V. BAZZETTA (02-94) 539 U.S. 126 (2003) ... OVERTON, DIRECTOR,
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al. v.