Did you mean: Letter v. United States Army Corps of Engineers?
Web Results

Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. Army Corps of ...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid_Waste_Agency_of_Northern_Cook_County_v._Army_Corps_of_Engineers

Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County (SWANCC) v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 531 ... being adjacent, lie within the reach of section 404, or, for that matter, within Congress' power unde...

in the united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit

www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions\pub\13/13-30262-CV0.pdf

Jul 30, 2014 ... v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS,. Defendant- ... matter jurisdiction, concluding that the JD is not “final agency action” and.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers v. Hawkes Co., Inc.: Wetlands ...

www.fed-soc.org/publications/detail/us-army-corps-of-engineers-v-hawkes-co-inc-wetlands-jurisdictional-determinations-and-the-right-of-federal-judicial-review

Mar 15, 2016 ... U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,<sup>3</sup> and the Fifth Circuit's decision in ... of wetlands within the meaning of the CWA (or, for that matter, at all), the ...

Hawkes Co. v. United States Army Corps of Engineers ...

elr.info/litigation/45/20070/hawkes-co-v-united-states-army-corps-engineers

Apr 10, 2015 ... The Eighth Circuit held that a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers jurisdictional ... that the court misapplied the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Sackett v. EPA ... parties unable, as a practical matter, to challenge those assertions.

solid waste agency of northern cook cty. v.army corps of engineers

www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-1178.ZO.html

V.ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (99-1178) 531 U.S. 159 (2001) ... The United States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), has interpreted §404(a) to confer ...

Borden Ranch v. United States Army Corps of Engineers - Opposition

www.justice.gov/osg/brief/borden-ranch-v-united-states-army-corps-engineers-opposition

Oct 21, 2014 ... United States Army Corps of Engineers - Opposition ... V 1999). The CWA further defines the "discharge of pollutants" to include "any ..... The lower courts found, however, as a matter of fact, that petitioners' activities "were not ...

302 F3d 1242 Georgia v. United States Army Corps of Engineers ...

openjurist.org/302/f3d/1242/georgia-v-united-states-army-corps-of-engineers

v. The UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, et al., Defendants, .... Rule 24(a) provides for intervention as a matter of right as follows: 21.

Kent Recycling Services, LLC v. US Army Corps of Engineers

www.pacificlegal.org/Case/Army-Corps-flouts-law-in-attempt-to-expand-its-control-of-private-property

Status: The U.S. Supreme Court denied the petition for writ of certiorari on March 23 ... For almost two decades the Army Corps of Engineers has exempted from ... use prior to 1985, no matter how the “prior converted croplands” are used today.

Rapanos v. United States, What Does It Mean?1

rapanos.typepad.com/Rapanoscomment.pdf

3 waters” as “waters of the United States.” The Army Corps of Engineers and the Environmental. 4. Protection Agency interpreted “navigable waters” to cover ...

Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. U.S. Army Corps of ...

www.cato.org/publications/legal-briefs/solid-waste-agency-northern-cook-county-v-us-army-corps-engineers

The agency was thus required to obtain a permit from the Army Corps of Engineers, which regulates the discharge of materials into “navigable waters” ...

More Info

14-5205 - US Court of Appeals

www.cadc.uscourts.gov

Sep 29, 2015 ... v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, ET AL.,. APPELLEES ... claimed that one of the agencies, the United States Army. Corps of Engineers ..... Enbridge contends that, as a prudential matter, we should dismiss ...

Hawkes Co., Inc. v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - SCOTUSblog

www.scotusblog.com

Apr 10, 2015 ... v. United States Army Corps of Engineers lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - .... As a general matter, two conditions must be satisfied for agency action.

ALABAMA v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS ...

caselaw.findlaw.com

Case opinion for US 11th Circuit ALABAMA v. ... United States Army Corps of Engineers, Peter F. Taylor, Colonel, in his capacity as District ...... neither imminent nor irreparable at law and is not the appropriate subject matter for injunctive relief.