Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County (SWANCC) v. U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, 531 ... being adjacent, lie within the reach of section 404, or, for that
matter, within Congress' power unde...
Jul 30, 2014 ... v. UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS,. Defendant- ... matter
jurisdiction, concluding that the JD is not “final agency action” and.
Mar 15, 2016 ... U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,<sup>3</sup> and the Fifth Circuit's decision in ... of wetlands
within the meaning of the CWA (or, for that matter, at all), the ...
Apr 10, 2015 ... The Eighth Circuit held that a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers jurisdictional ... that
the court misapplied the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Sackett v. EPA ...
parties unable, as a practical matter, to challenge those assertions.
V.ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (99-1178) 531 U.S. 159 (2001) ... The United
States Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), has interpreted §404(a) to confer ...
Oct 21, 2014 ... United States Army Corps of Engineers - Opposition ... V 1999). The CWA further
defines the "discharge of pollutants" to include "any ..... The lower courts found,
however, as a matter of fact, that petitioners' activities "were not ...
v. The UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, et al., Defendants, ....
Rule 24(a) provides for intervention as a matter of right as follows: 21.
Status: The U.S. Supreme Court denied the petition for writ of certiorari on March
23 ... For almost two decades the Army Corps of Engineers has exempted from ...
use prior to 1985, no matter how the “prior converted croplands” are used today.
3 waters” as “waters of the United States.” The Army Corps of Engineers and the
Environmental. 4. Protection Agency interpreted “navigable waters” to cover ...
The agency was thus required to obtain a permit from the Army Corps of
Engineers, which regulates the discharge of materials into “navigable waters” ...