Majority, Murphy, joined by Roberts, Black, Reed, Douglas, Byrnes. Dissent,
Frankfurter, joined by Stone. Jackson took no part in the consideration or
decision of the case. Laws applied. U.S. Const....
Jul 11, 2005 ... Doug Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional ... The
court denied Murphy's petition on the one remaining Batson v.
Jul 17, 2015 ... 87 Id. (quoting Murphy v. Dretke, 416 F.3d 427, 432 (5th Cir. 2005)). 88 Although
the prosecution referred to “special issue number two” in ...
Dec 24, 2015 ... Cullen v. Pinholster, 131 S. Ct. 1388 (2011), allows federal ...... requires, could
not have crafted a new legal standard.”); Murphy v. Dretke,.
Dec 14, 2010 ... v. LEN DAVIS,. Defendant-Appellant. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES
DISTRICT ..... Dretke, 419 F.3d 365 (5th Cir. ..... Murphy v.
May 1, 2006 ... In 1986, the United States Supreme Court laid out in Batson v. Kentucky a three-
step ... THE IMPACT OF MILLER-EL V. DRETKE. 1329. Batson errors5 but ......
jury shuffling or official policies); Murphy v. Dretke, 416 F.3d 427, ...
Medellin v. Dretke. t Professor of Law, Co-Director, Joseph R. Crowley Program
in ..... Sean D. Murphy, Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to.
v. DOUG DRETKE, DIRECTOR,. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,
..... Murphy v. Netherland, 116 F.3d 97 (CA4 1997)............ 9, 10. Murray v.
Miller-El v. Dretke, 545 U.S. 231 (2005), is a decision by the Supreme Court of
the United States that clarified the constitutional limitations on the use by ...
MEDELLIN V. DRETKE: ANOTHER CHAPTER IN THE ...... see also Sean D.
Murphy, Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International.