Web Results

Nix v. Hedden

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nix_v._Hedden

Nix v. Hedden, 149 U.S. 304 (1893), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that, under U.S. customs regulations, the tomato should be ...

Nix v. Williams :: 467 U.S. 431 (1984) :: Justia U.S. Supreme Court ...

supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/467/431/case.html

Nix v. Williams. No. 82-1651. Argued January 18, 1984. Decided June 11, 1984. 467 U.S. 431. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS.

NIX v. HEDDEN - ARS

www.ars.usda.gov/Main/docs.htm?docid=16646

Oct 22, 2013 ... The tomato, like its relative the potato, has its origin in South America. It was domesticated in Mexico and its name is derived from the Aztec ...

Legal Solutions Blog Today in 1893: The Supreme Court rules that ...

blog.legalsolutions.thomsonreuters.com/legal-research/today-in-1893-the-supreme-court-rules-that-tomatoes-are-vegetables-not-fruits/

May 10, 2013 ... Nonetheless, the Supreme Court did, indeed, answer that question in 1893's Nix v. Hedden, decided 120 years ago today. You are probably ...

A Common Sense Understanding of Inevitable Discovery: Why Nix v ...

ssrn.com/abstract=2715196

Jan 15, 2016 ... A Common Sense Understanding of Inevitable Discovery: Why Nix v. Williams Does Not Require Active Pursuit in the Application of the ...

When The Supreme Court Decided Tomatoes Were Vegetables - NPR

www.npr.org/sections/money/2013/12/26/256586055/when-the-supreme-court-decided-tomatoes-were-vegetables

Dec 26, 2013 ... In a recent show, we talked about an importer that sold pillows shaped like stuffed animals. Or maybe they're stuffed animals that can be used ...

A Valuable but Easily Abused Exception to the Exclusionary Rule

scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6442&context=jclc

Printed in U.S.A.. SIXTH AMENDMENT-INEVITABLE. DISCOVERY: A VALUABLE BUT. EASILY ABUSED EXCEPTION TO. THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE. Nix v.

Supreme Court of the United States - Uncyclopedia, the content-free ...

mirror.uncyc.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States

Nov 9, 2012 ... USA; 4.11 Roe vs. Brown; 4.12 Rossie O'Donnell vs. God; 4.13 Money vs. Looks; 4.14 Nix v. Hedden. 5 Members of the Supreme Court.

Mapp v. Ohio (1961) - Infoplease

www.infoplease.com/us/supreme-court/cases/ar19.html

Weeks v. United States, 1914, established the exclusionary rule barring the ... Rule” has since been modified by decisions of the Burger Court, including Nix v.

court opinions - U.S. Courts

cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2012/09/11/11-15631.pdf

Sep 11, 2012 ... 2:10-cv-02138-DGC v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED ...... Nix v. Hedden, 149 U.S. 304,. 306-07 (1893). The ordinary meaning of ...

More Info

Supreme Court Tomato Is Vegetable - Business Insider

www.businessinsider.com

Dec 30, 2013 ... And the court essentially gave that reasoning in Nix v. Hedden: A tomato is a vegetable because people think it is. The arguments were short ...

122 Years Ago Today, The Supreme Court Ruled That Tomato Is A ...

news.bitofnews.com

May 9, 2015 ... From the Supreme Court ruling of Nix v. Hedden: ... A Lipid Tail: How Trans Fat Went From America's Favorite Ingredient to Being Banned.

Nix v. Holder | The Center for Individual Rights

www.cir-usa.org

Nov 12, 2012 ... On November 12, 2012, the Supreme Court denied CIR's petition for a writ of certiorari in Nix v. Holder, CIR's challenge to Section 5 of the ...