Pacific Gas & Electric v. Public Utilities Commission, 475 U.S. 1 (1986), was a
United States ... Electric Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of California et al.
Oct 3, 2016 ... Plaintiffs-Appellants v. UNITED STATES,. Defendant-Appellee ... Pacific Gas and
Electric Company, Southern Califor- nia Edison Company ...
Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Petitioner, v. Federal Power Commission,
Respondent, General Motorscorporation et al., ... Circuit Judge, and A.
SHERMAN CHRISTENSEN, United States Senior District Judge for the District of
America distributed generation division. She spent ... November 18, 2016 |
California Northern Tiger Natural Gas, Inc. v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company et
AMEC/Zachry Crushed Stone Contractors Joint Venture, et al. v. ... Packers Plus
Energy Services (USA) Inc.: Representation of Packers Plus in breach of contract
suit ... In Re Pacific Gas and Electric Company: Representation involving PG&E ...
Combined natural gas and electric utility provider for northern and central
California. Open, close or transfer service, Chapter 11 information, system status,
Jun 14, 2016 ... In the United States Court of Appeals for the District of ... TRANSMISSION
AGENCY OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL.,. Petitioners, v. ... Pacific Gas &
Electric Co., 149 FERC ¶ 61,276 (2014), FERC Dkts. ER15-223 ...
Mar 20, 2007 ... claim in the bankruptcy action to protect itself should PG&E default ... Pp. 4–5. (b)
Under the Bankruptcy Code, the bankruptcy court “shall al- .... 2001, 11 U. S. C. §
1101 et seq., and continued thereafter to operate its business ...
Jun 7, 1990 ... PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BEAR
STEARNS & COMPANY et al., Defendants and Respondents ..... that it attempted
to induce the United States to breach its contract with the company, ...
Rick successfully represented Pacific Gas and Electric Company in evidentiary ...
Bekins Moving, et al., Rick represented Navistar against claims that it violated
California's Prop. ... In litigation over a commercial disposal site, United States v.